Herald on Sunday

Balancing the protection of privacy with public interest

- Kevin Kenrick Dry times

Last Sunday this newspaper reported that “male presenters at Television New Zealand earn an average $40,000 more a year than their female counterpar­ts, a gender pay gap the state-owned broadcaste­r spent two years trying to keep secret”.

This was based on an interpreta­tion of informatio­n provided by TVNZ in response to an Official Informatio­n Act request. In response, I offer the following observatio­ns:

1. The $40,000 figure does not in any way represent a reliable measure of the difference in pay between female and male presenters at TVNZ.

The data reported by the Herald on Sunday was averaged to protect individual­s’ right to privacy, so it couldn’t and doesn’t provide an accurate comparison of individual pay by gender.

The data provided included presenters who worked one day a week and others who worked five days a week. It represente­d some programmes that run for 52 weeks of the year and others for part of the year. It included individual­s with multiple decades of presenting experience and others with less than three years’ experience. It also represente­d a different set of individual­s over each of the three years of data based on when they joined or left the business. Although all individual­s included in the data were presenters at TVNZ, they don’t do the same jobs — and because of that they’re paid differentl­y.

2. TVNZ is committed to defending employees’ right to privacy.

So why didn’t we disclose individual salaries and avoid this problem? Our presenters are willing to put themselves in the public eye as part of doing their job. They accept the loss of anonymity that goes with this profile, but they don’t expect their employer to publicly divulge their individual pay details.

As an organisati­on, we have a responsibi­lity to our employees. When the Herald requested salary details of our top 10 presenters split by male and female, we had concerns about privacy, and we voiced this. The Herald then asked the Chief Ombudsman to rule on the matter.

The Ombudsman sought advice from the Privacy Commission­er and the Department of Statistics and concluded “the small numbers involved do mean that there is a real prospect disclosure could reveal fairly accurate salary informatio­n about individual­s”. The Ombudsman recommende­d TVNZ provide informatio­n from a larger sample and TVNZ complied. Like the Herald, TVNZ would have welcomed a determinat­ion in 24 hours rather than 24 months, but the duration of the Ombudsman process was outside our control.

3. Gender pay parity matters.

I agree with the Herald that gender pay parity matters. However, this issue is too important to be clouded by what I consider sensationa­l headlines and misleading analysis.

TVNZ is committed to ensuring individual­s doing substantia­lly the same work receive the same pay. We review pay across like-for-like roles every year and make adjustment­s where required.

Transparen­cy is important, and TVNZ’s gender pay gap is publicly disclosed in our annual report. Last year it was 4.6 per cent unfavourab­le to women. The primary driver of this gap was lower representa­tion of women in some higher-paid roles — not the difference in pay for women versus men in similar jobs, and not a gender pay gap among our presenters.

TVNZ is a big believer in diversity of thinking and actively promotes balanced gender representa­tion and stronger ethnic representa­tion across the business. As detailed in our annual report, women represente­d 49 per cent of our workforce, 54 per cent of our business leaders, 44 per cent of our executive team, and 43 per cent of our board last financial year. TVNZ people identify with 38 ethnicitie­s and speak 30 languages. We are committed to publicly reporting on our progress every year.

We actively support equal pay for equal work but don’t support breaching staff privacy to demonstrat­e this commitment.

● Kevin Kenrick is chief executive at TVNZ

Niwa says there is no sign of the country’s droughts ending any time soon. Its February climate summary showed much of the North Island and parts of the South Island have been in severe meteorolog­ical drought. February was also a degree warmer than average, and principal forecastin­g scientist Chris Brandolino said no significan­t rain was on the way. It comes after Agricultur­e Minister Damien O’Connor this week classified Gisborne, Manawatu, Rangitikei and Tararua as experienci­ng a medium-level adverse event. That adds them to Northland, Auckland and Waikato and allows government funding to be made available to support farmers and growers.

School closed

A Christchur­ch school will not open its doors tomorrow after a blaze ripped through three classrooms on Friday night. Fire and Emergency New Zealand shift manager Riwai Grace said they received multiple calls in relation to a fire at South New Brighton School about 6.40pm.

High hopes

Northland’s $20 million pilot kingfish farming venture brings huge aquacultur­e potential for the region according to Regional Economic Developmen­t Minister Shane Jones. Jones said the on-land aquacultur­e venture at Bream Bay near Whanga¯ rei focused on looking at how a commercial kingfish venture of its type could be used as a model to help others in Northland and New Zealand to set up a similar enterprise.

 ?? Photo / Getty Images ?? Kevin Kenrick says Television New Zealand isn’t prepared to make public what it pays individual staff members.
Photo / Getty Images Kevin Kenrick says Television New Zealand isn’t prepared to make public what it pays individual staff members.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand