Herald on Sunday

Student dodges uni penalty

A rape complaint was upheld — but the perpetrato­r had left

- Dubby Henry

An Auckland University student who admitted raping another student has left the university and dodged a penalty.

As revealed by the Herald on Sunday last month, the university’s proctor agreed the man had twice raped and physically assaulted a woman who lived in his accommodat­ion hall last year.

But he was initially given a written reprimand and allowed to keep studying.

The woman — who had become depressed, quit her studies and left New Zealand — challenged that decision, producing a recording of the man admitting what had happened was “technicall­y rape”.

Following our story, the university revoked the decision and apologised to the woman. It referred the case to the disciplina­ry committee, which has the power to unenrol people for serious breaches of the student code.

Reporting on the case led to outrage and a petition calling for the man to be removed from campus.

But the Herald on Sunday has learned the student has now quit his studies days before a disciplina­ry hearing last Monday, meaning the university could not impose any further penalty.

His victim only learned of his decision during the hearing, when she was expecting him to explain his actions. It was the second time the man had failed to appear — a hearing was to be held late last month but was delayed at the last minute after he asked for a chance to get legal advice.

The woman told the Herald on Sunday she was shocked to find out he had left several days earlier and would not appear at the hearing.

“Basically, the meeting was pointless and caused me so much unnecessar­y distress less than an hour before I had to write an exam for school.”

The woman, who appeared via Zoom, was asked at the meeting to give her version of events but refused, given the committee already had her statement.

“I just didn’t understand why they wanted me to still attend the meeting and repeat everything that happened, even though it’s really hard for me to talk about.

“I told them I wasn’t going to say anything. I was mad that they wanted me to relive it for no reason. If he wasn’t going to give his side then I didn’t see the point.”

It is understood her complaint was then upheld and it was found the man’s conduct constitute­d sexual harassment which was in breach of its policies.

However, because he had withdrawn from study and was no longer enrolled, no penalty could be imposed.

The woman was concerned the man could enrol at another university and potentiall­y move into accommodat­ion there without anyone knowing his history.

“I would worry about everyone’s safety.”

The woman initially thought she could not go to the police because she had left New Zealand. After learning that was incorrect, she has laid a complaint with police.

The prospect of dragging out the case through court and reliving her experience made her unhappy — “but I don’t really know what else to do at this point because the university didn’t do anything”.

The university told the Herald on Sunday the woman’s complaint had been referred to and determined by the discipline committee and the matter was “now at an end”.

“The process and outcome of this complaint are strictly confidenti­al, as they are for all student discipline investigat­ions. The university therefore does not intend to comment on this matter further.

“The university takes acts of sexual harassment against members of the university very seriously.”

● If you’ve ever experience­d sexual assault and need to talk to someone, contact Safe to Talk confidenti­ally on 0800 044 334 or text 4334.

 ?? ?? Herald on Sunday, March 20
Herald on Sunday, March 20

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand