Mayor axes Port lease plan
Auckland Mayor Wayne Brown’s decision this week to scrap plans for a 35-year lease for Port of Auckland while keeping the land in public hands was driven by the simple equation of not having the numbers to proceed.
With a majority of councillors opposed to the lease and a narrow majority of submissions on the proposal in the council’s long-term plan giving it the thumbs down, the mayor brokered a $1.1 billion deal with management and the Maritime Union.
Brown has long had a fixation with Port of Auckland, having chaired the Upper North Island Supply Chain Strategy working group in 2018-2019 that proposed moving port operations to Northport, near Whanga¯ rei.
On the hustings in 2022, Brown said the port occupied $6b of prime waterfront land and made a campaign promise to deliver $400m a year to its owner, Auckland Council.
Once in office, he wrote to the board chair Jan Dawson instructing the board and management to create a plan for public use of the port land from Queens Wharf to Bledisloe Wharf, resulting in plans last year for an open-air seawater swimming pool, aquaculture, an exhibition centre and “Te Ao Ma¯ ori showcase centre”.
Picking up on work started under former Mayor Phil Goff, the mayor jumped on the idea of creating a wealth fund for the city with the proceeds of the lease, estimated at between $2b and $3b, and the council’s remaining airport shares, worth about $1b.
Brown became the cheerleader for the fund, saying it was a smart way of diversifying assets prone to natural disasters and a prudent step to secure the council’s financial future.
Aucklanders could be excused for being a little confused about the mixed messages from the mayor on the port, whose latest pronouncement was the $1.1b of port profits over 10 years exceeds the projected returns from investing the proceeds of a port lease by $172m.
This will be achieved by improvements in productivity and increased port charges.
The latest plan raises questions. Will the wealth fund, the Auckland Future Fund, be viable with just the proceeds of the remaining airport shares? Is it wise to more than double container landing costs to boost port profits? Does it make sense for the council to have all its eggs in two baskets?
There is a silver lining in maintaining the status quo. Keeping the port business and waterfront in public ownership means Aucklanders will be more engaged in expanding the public realm on Waitemata¯ Harbour, and, longer-term, in any work to move the port.
This paper is subject to the New Zealand Media Council
● Complaints to be first directed to: formalcomplaints@nzherald.co.nz
● If unsatisfied, the complaint may be referred to the New Zealand Media Council: PO Box 10-879, The Terrace, Wellington 6143, or email: info@mediacouncil.org.nz
● Details and online complaints form at: mediacouncil.org.nz