Kapiti News

Council drops roadway prosecutio­n

Enforcemen­t order considered to address incidents or failures, consent breaches, unconsente­d activities

- Georgina Campbell

The attitude of the JV [CPB HEB Joint Venture] appears to have been careless or cavalier. Andrew Britton, Greater Wellington Regional Council lawyer

The Greater Wellington Regional Council has dismissed 17 charges related to the mega Transmissi­on Gully highway and is instead going down another legal avenue to protect the environmen­t.

The charges were dismissed in August last year with the majority of them related to sediment discharges from open earthworks into water across the project.

It’s the latest developmen­t in what has become a questionab­le environmen­tal track record for the $1.25 billion motorway.

The long-awaited road opened to traffic almost two years ago but technicall­y remains unfinished and is facing legal challenges on more than one front.

Greater Wellington Regional Council strategy, policy and regulation director Fathima Iftikar said the council was now looking at something called an enforcemen­t order.

This order has the power to compel parties to remediate previous failures and ensure future compliance with consent conditions, Iftikar said.

“It would also provide a focus on the environmen­tal outcomes that need to be achieved by the parties within the consented framework.”

An applicatio­n for an enforcemen­t order has yet to be filed with the Environmen­t Court as the council is continuing to work with its legal team and relevant parties.

The council would not disclose the identity of these parties as they were part of an ongoing investigat­ion and potential enforcemen­t action.

The four-lane motorway was built through a public-private partnershi­p (PPP), the Wellington Gateway Partnershi­p (WGP), with CPB Contractor­s and HEB Constructi­on subcontrac­ted to carry out the design and constructi­on.

The council has previously pursued prosecutio­n in one case against CPB HEB Joint Venture (JV).

Four charges were laid concerning track earthworks undertaken in May 2019, which caused material to enter the river beds of Duck Creek and Cannons Creek.

In 2021, GWRC’s lawyer, Andrew

Britton, told the Environmen­t Court the streams were not just affected by fine sediment, but by rocks and boulders going down the hillside.

He said the JV did not take steps to mitigate what happened or alert the council to something being wrong until days after the fact.

“The attitude of the JV appears to have been careless or cavalier.”

But CPB HEB JV lawyer Hamish Harwood firmly rejected this characteri­sation.

He said an “all hands to the task approach” was undertaken including the use of helicopter­s so, to suggest the JV was “slack” was not supported by these events.

The Environmen­t Court issued a $70,000 fine.

However, the road’s environmen­tal track record only went from bad to worse with 260 incidents or failures, consent breaches, and unconsente­d activities recorded by the middle of last year, according to informatio­n released under the Local Government Official Informatio­n and Meetings Act.

WGP chief executive John Humphrey said he was unable to comment on matters relating to the enforcemen­t order.

“In terms of general comment, we note that throughout the motorway constructi­on, the entire project team has continued to strive towards achieving the right environmen­tal outcomes in the context of an extremely complex constructi­on within a significan­t and sensitive environmen­t.”

Greater Wellington Regional Council chairman Daran Ponter said it has been difficult to hold parties to account for their treatment of the environmen­t throughout the Transmissi­on Gully project.

The regional council might have approached resource consenting and compliance differentl­y if it had its time again, he said.

“There’s a need to really look at this big-style project with big players and how you actually hold them to account.”

Meanwhile, CPB HEB JV has launched its own legal action against NZTA amid the wrangle to get the road fully finished.

NZTA transport services general manager Brett Gliddon has previously said the dispute relates to incomplete works on the road and the expectatio­n these should be completed to the standard in the project’s contract.

At the time Gliddon confirmed the legal action, in November last year, the outstandin­g works included a new State Highway 59 connection between Mackays Crossing and Paekākārik­i, works at the Pā uatahanui interchang­e, a recreation­al track along parts of the route, and maintenanc­e access tracks.

Assurances have been made Transmissi­on Gully continues to be safe and open for public use.

 ?? Photo / Mark Mitchell ?? Transmissi­on Gully has been open for two years but is still not officially finished.
Photo / Mark Mitchell Transmissi­on Gully has been open for two years but is still not officially finished.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand