Marlborough Express - Weekend Express
Council to review housing for seniors
The Marlborough District Council plans to review its ageing and expensive senior housing stock.
The “high-level” review, by an external reviewer, will consider options on how best meet the needs of the community and the council’s 180 tenants.
Marlborough District Council property and community facilities manager Jamie Lyall said the senior housing had its challenges because most of the homes were more than 50 years old.
Their “very high” repair and maintenance costs were about 26% of their total revenue, and depreciation of the properties was 35%. It meant the portfolio ran at a small loss, although it was projected to reach break even during the 2027-28 financial year.
“So it’s timely to actually do a review and look at the options that are available,” Lyall told the council’s economic, finance and community committee on April 30.
Pensioners who lived in the flats had raised concerns about rent increases in the past, and some homes on Andrew Place had needed refurbishing in 2021 because they did not meet “healthy home” standards.
A report prepared by Lyall for the meeting said the purpose of the review was to understand if the current operation of the council’s senior housing activity met the needs of the community.
It would also consider the council’s policy and role in seniors’ housing provision, asset and tenant management processes, opportunities to expand or diversify the portfolio, and future delivery options.
The council owned and managed 185 senior housing units across Marlborough, including in Renwick, Picton and Blenheim,
with day-to-day management by APL Property.
Units ranged from bedsit to two-bedroom, although most were one-bedroom units.
The council’s policy was to set rent levels at 80% of the market rate, the report said.
“The tenant entry criteria is low-value asset ownership and superannuation eligibility.”
As councils could not gain Community Housing Provider status, they could not get government operational assistance, Lyall said.
The council had allocated $10,000 towards the review, from the $105,000 remaining from the “Better off” funding that paid for solar panels on Te Kahu o Waipuna, Blenheim’s new library and art gallery.
The rest of the leftover funding should be retained for consultation, implementation and legal review, should council decide to go down a specific route, Lyall’s report said.
Housing policy was under review by the coalition Government, with an announcement on any proposed changes due before the May budget meeting. Any changes would be incorporated into the council’s review.
It would be the first council housing review since 2015. Previous reviews focused on housing infrastructure and potential development opportunities.
The council’s new 12-unit complex on Blenheim’s George St would soon be completed, which Lyall said had been “challenging” due to increased construction costs and supply chain issues.