Pope ex­plains de­frock­ing

Marlborough Express - - FRONT PAGE -

was un­nec­es­sary. The Vat­i­can said the de­ci­sion can­not be ap­pealed.

Cox, 87 and suf­fer­ing from de­men­tia, is a mem­ber of the Schoen­statt re­li­gious or­der and had served as a bishop in Chillan, Chile be­fore be­com­ing the No. 2 of­fi­cial at the Vat­i­can’s Pon­tif­i­cal Coun­cil for the Fam­ily, a high­pro­file po­si­tion dur­ing St John Paul II’S pa­pacy.

He re­turned to Chile and be­came bishop in La Ser­ena un­til he left in 1997 un­der un­clear cir­cum­stances, but took on ad­min­is­tra­tive jobs in Rome and at the Latin Amer­i­can bish­ops’ con­fer­ence in Colom­bia.

In 2002, the Vat­i­can of­fice for bish­ops asked the Schoen­statt Fa­thers to take him in one of its houses, ap­par­ently be­cause of abuse al­le­ga­tions. He has been liv­ing in Ger­many since then but last year a new, for­mal ac­cu­sa­tion was re­ceived by the Vat­i­can about an al­leged case of abuse that hap­pened in Ger­many in 2004.

The Schoen­statt Fa­thers said Satur­day the Vat­i­can had asked that Cox re­main in their cus­tody. The or­der said it would co­op­er­ate with the jus­tice sys­tem, given that vic­tims in Chile have made crim­i­nal com­plaints against him.

‘‘We re­ceive this news with much shame for the dam­age caused to the vic­tims,’’ the com­mu­nity said. ‘‘We show sol­i­dar­ity with them and their pro­found suf­fer­ing. To­day more than ever, we de­plore every act of abuse that of­fends the dig­nity of peo­ple.’’

Given the favour that Cox en­joyed by John Paul’s in­ner cir­cle, his fall is yet an­other stain on John Paul’s legacy. It also calls into ques­tion the se­nior Schoen­statt car­di­nal in Chile, Car­di­nal Javier Er­razuriz, an ad­viser to Fran­cis who has long been ac­cused of cov­er­ing up for abusers.

Or­denes Fer­nan­dez, 53, for his part, was made bishop of Iquique, in north­ern Chile, in 2006 at the young age of 42. He re­tired six years later al­legedly for health rea­sons.

But sub­se­quently al­le­ga­tions of abuse were lev­elled against him.

Pre­vi­ously, the Vat­i­can has rarely, if ever, an­nounced lai­ciza­tions of in­di­vid­ual pri­ests and only is­sued a sin­gle-line state­ment if a bishop had re­signed, with­out fur­ther ex­pla­na­tion.

Be­fore Fran­cis’ pa­pacy be­gan in 2013, it was Vat­i­can prac­tice to re­veal if res­ig­na­tions were re­tire­ments due to age, or for some other ‘grave’ rea­son that made them un­fit for of­fice.

But Fran­cis early on re­moved even that min­i­mum amount of in­for­ma­tion. –AP

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand

© PressReader. All rights reserved.