Marlborough Express

Nats’ jobs growth advert ruled misleading

-

December 2019 for the benefit figures and the Household Labour Force Survey for the third quarter of 2015 through to the third quarter of 2017.

Following two complaints, the authority’s complaints board ruled that the phrase ‘‘every month under National’’ was misleading as the data used did not cover the entire nine-year period of the National Government, but instead a selective period.

The board noted that the comparison itself was fair, however, even as it compared two quite different datasets.

It noted that political advertisem­ents were well within their rights to present ‘‘specific data with a bias in its favour in order to make a political point’’.

The complainan­t said National was intentiona­lly misleading consumers because if you averaged out its nine years in power there were in fact 3581 new jobs a month.

National argued in its response that the best numbers to use were the more recent figures as they were at a more comparable point in the economic cycle.

‘‘If we were to compare the entire nine-year period under National then that would require including the Global Financial Crisis years, which would clearly not be a reasonable comparison with the period under Labour.’’

A National spokesman said the party would appeal the decision.

The advert remains online, in line with National’s policy of keeping an advert online while it appeals a negative ruling.

ASA chief executive Hilary Souter said the authority generally expected adverts to be removed during the appeal process if a complaint was upheld against them.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand