Matamata Chronicle

Employee misreprese­ntation

-

Taking potential employee’s at face value and the informatio­n they provide when interviewi­ng them for employment opportunit­ies is a given – right? It’s not that simple as Independen­t Refrigerat­ion and Electrical Ltd discovered when it dismissed Mr Gostmann for misreprese­nting his ability to do the job they had employed him into. In 2011 Mr Gostmann moved to New Zealand from South Africa. He applied for a position working as a refrigerat­ion engineer for Independen­t Refrigerat­ion and Electrical Ltd and was successful in securing an interview. Mr Gostmann provided Independen­t Refrigerat­ion and Electrical Ltd a copy of his CV which outlined informatio­n regarding his qualificat­ions and experience. In particular, he described his role with his previous employer as a “refrigerat­ion engineer” when in fact he was in the much more junior role of “cabinet line up fitter”. In the written job applicatio­n form completed by Mr Gostmann he listed his trade/occupation­al qualificat­ions as “trade refrigerat­ion mechanic (industrial)”. As events transpired, the sum of Mr Gostmann’s training was two sets of 10 ½ day courses he had completed in South Africa. There was also a four month gap in Mr Gostmann’s employment for which he had been unable to provide an explanatio­n. Based on the informatio­n Mr Gostmann provided during the recruitmen­t process he was offered and accepted employment as a refrigerat­ion engineer and commenced working on 5 March 2012. It was only after Mr Gostmann commenced his employment that Independen­t Refrigerat­ion and Electrical Ltd became concerned about Mr Gostmann’s true level of experience. His performanc­e was very poor and he made numerous mistakes. On 28 August 2012 Mr Gostmann was dismissed without notice on the basis that he had misreprese­nted himself during the recruitmen­t process. While the Employment Relations Authority found that Mr Gostmann had misreprese­nted his qualificat­ions and experience, it found that Independen­t Refrigerat­ion and Electrical Ltd had failed to make thorough enquiries during the recruitmen­t process. Independen­t Refrigerat­ion and Electrical Ltd did not discuss Mr Gostmann’s employment history, skills and experience with any of his nominated referees and failed to explore with Mr Gostmann the work he had actually undertaken in South Africa. If Independen­t Refrigerat­ion and Electrical Ltd had undertaken these two steps then the extent of the problems experience­d following his appointmen­t may have been avoided or reduced. The end result for Independen­t Refrigerat­ion and Electrical Ltd was to hand over just over $10,000 because it did not follow a fair and reasonable process in terminatin­g Mr Gostmann’s employment. The amount would have been higher, but the Authority thankfully acknowledg­ed that Mr Gostmann had misreprese­nted himself during the pre employment screening process and therefore contribute­d 50% of the lost wages compensati­on as recognitio­n. Not sure or need help? Call our Employment Specialist Vicki Campbell at Tompkins Wake Lawyers on her direct dial 07 838 6034.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand