Nelson Mail

Farmers question Fonterra proposal

- Andrea Fox

Fonterra will no longer be 100 per cent supplier-owned if a shareholde­r fund is created as part of the share trading among farmers proposal, say opponents as New Zealand’s biggest company gears up for a fresh debate on its capital restructur­e plan.

Fonterra dairy farmer Andrew Cryer of Franklin, and Lachlan McKenzie, former chairman of Federated Farmers’ dairy wing, said once shares are held by a ‘‘nonsupplyi­ng entity’’ – such as the proposed shareholde­rs fund – the co-op could not be deemed 100 per cent supplying shareholde­r-owned.

‘‘The shareholde­r fund, no matter however it is constructe­d with smoke and mirrors, is a nonsupplyi­ng entity,’’ the pair said.

‘‘Therefore under [Fonterra chairman] Sir Henry van der Heyden we will only have 100 per cent control and no longer 100 per cent supplier ownership if the proposed fund comes to fruition.’’

Fonterra’s co-operative principles said shares could only be held by supplying shareholde­rs, they said. ‘‘Is the shareholde­rs fund a Trojan horse to get Fonterra listed on the NZX?’’

Cryer called for Fonterra to provide farmers with advance details on the material to be presented to them at Trading Among Farmers (TAF) meetings around the country starting on January 31.

Without details to digest before the meetings, farmers could not have an informed debate, ‘‘so the meetings only will have half the value’’, Cryer said.

A Fonterra spokesman

said material would be available on Fonterra’s Fencepost website a day before the meetings started.

Ninety per cent of shareholde­rs had in 2010 ‘‘voted in support of the shareholde­rs fund’’, he said.

Cryer agreed farmers had supported ‘‘a perception’’ of TAF that year. But it had since become clear the proposal involved ‘‘outside investors’’, he said.

Under the proposal, which needs legislatio­n, farmers needing cashflow would place shares with a Fonterra Shareholde­rs’ Fund and be paid the share value for the rights to dividends and any change in market value, while retaining voting rights.

Cryer and Mckenzie said Fonterra had a good balance sheet and did not need the shareholde­rs fund. ‘‘Current options for capital are retentions, new shares and debt. The indication is that Fonterra had around $600 million of new capital last financial year [which] suggests new capital is not an issue.’’

 ?? Photo: FAIRFAX NZ ?? Not needed: Lachlan Mckenzie on his farm at Kaharoa in the Waikato.
Photo: FAIRFAX NZ Not needed: Lachlan Mckenzie on his farm at Kaharoa in the Waikato.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand