Nelson Mail

No option for Folau but to go

-

Israel Folau has to go. That much is clear. After that it gets a little messy. A year ago, after the Wallaby declared his strongly held belief that gays will go to hell, many people cut him some slack; we were conflicted by a person choosing to espouse such strong religious views in a society increasing­ly focused on diversity and harmony. How could one sit with the other, we asked. That debate continues.

In the end we agreed an unwritten contract with the sportsman: we know your beliefs and respect your conviction­s, but

please keep your extreme views to yourself.

His employer, Rugby Australia, put that down on paper. Folau signed a new four-year deal last year that reportedly made him the world’s highest-paid player (NZ$2.2 million a year, according to estimates from walesonlin­e.co.uk).

The contract made it clear any ‘‘social media posts or commentary that is in any way disrespect­ful to people because of their sexuality will result in disciplina­ry action’’, says Rugby Australia chief executive Raelene Castle.

Folau broke his contract with both public and employer in this week’s social media outburst. And his actions since – Rugby Australia was unable to contact either him or his agent for close to a day after the tweet landed to get an explanatio­n – suggest the player either miscalcula­ted the extent of the outrage, again, or knew exactly what he was doing.

Either way, he has left little room to move and, realistica­lly, only one course of action: you may be the best player in green and gold but two strikes and you’re out.

Folau’s fall would have obvious implicatio­ns for a Wallabies squad short of world-class players and six months out from the code’s biggest tournament. That is one for Wallabies coach Michael Cheika to sort out; no doubt after an earnest discussion with his boss, Castle.

For the rest of us, it gets a little complicate­d. It is tempting to resurrect and repolish past concerns about impacts on freedom of speech and the part played by sportspeop­le and celebritie­s. Especially in the aftermath of a horrendous crime that has affected both Australia and New Zealand, and given the ongoing debate about hate speech.

But Folau has so flagrantly abused any notion of duty of care towards his responsibi­lities as a public figure, and widened the scope of his scorn to practicall­y everyone, that he has critically undermined the higher ground he so grandly claims.

Fornicator­s? Drunks? Atheists? Seriously.

Folau’s folly is another reminder any faith in the infallible propriety of sportspeop­le is misplaced. We worry about our young and vulnerable looking to such people for inspiratio­n, but that should be a mark against wider society, rather than Folau and other miscreants.

Some commentato­rs are concerned that a man being dismissed because of his strident religious views is a watershed moment in sidelining free speech and debate on uncomforta­ble topics.

In reality, we have merely created a higher waterline for how we expect people to live together and respect each other’s difference­s. And one man has again found himself some way below it.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand