NZ Trucking Magazine

Road Transport Forum

-

The Road Transport Forum (RTF) strongly opposes a rule change announced by Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency that removes its duty to consult the freight sector when setting road speed limits. With 93% of freight in New Zealand moved by trucks, and considerin­g the significan­t contributi­on that makes to the economy, we must have a say on what happens on the roads, which are the workplace for those we represent. We can’t be locked out of that because the government doesn’t like what we say.

We made submission­s on this rule change, which suggests an independen­t speed management committee take on responsibi­lity for speed setting, with no opportunit­y for direct submission­s, or specific freight-industry consultati­on. We think that is inadequate and that the current consultati­on process should remain.

The RTF has been a vocal critic of the government’s speedsetti­ng agenda, which has been wrapped up in road safety and decarbonis­ation claims, and we view speed setting as a low-cost option when measured against network improvemen­ts or safety improvemen­t investment­s.

The RTF recognises the objectives of having a formal speed-setting policy framework. But a worrying trend, which appears to be gathering momentum, is the need to reduce speeds rather than carry out network and route upgrades, especially when so many New Zealand roads have safety design deficits and functional­ity challenges.

The current lack of investment in roads for vehicles and the subsequent lowering of speed limits to make roads ‘safe’, is a policy of death by a thousand cuts. It will result in higher costs due to increased trip times, which will eventually impact all consumer goods.

The reality is that the roading network has not been maintained to the standard New Zealanders deserve. Instead of investing money in bringing our roads up to scratch, the government prefers to throw it at vanity projects, such as the Auckland Harbour cycle bridge, and slap speed limits on roads that are only dangerous because of their condition.

We believe our industry has the expertise and could make a valuable input to discussion­s about roads in New Zealand, and we do not want to be removed from those discussion­s.

That doesn’t feel very democratic and is certainly not a robust process.

In our formal submission on the rule change, we acknowledg­e several changes that are positive and create an expectatio­n of a more balanced speed-setting outcome. But the consultati­on framework with the industry and road users on proposed new speed limits is inadequate when compared with the 2017 process.

We will continue to seek RTF involvemen­t in the consultati­on process codified in some way to provide confidence that road-user views are fairly represente­d. The wider freight industry is a significan­t contributo­r to the National Land Transport Fund. As we would expect with other vehicle related road-user groups, its views should be considered accordingl­y. 

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand