Otago Daily Times

Not easy being Green, and getting elected

- Chris Trotter is editor of the New Zealand Political Review.

AS a guardian of left wing orthodoxy, Sue Bradford is without peer. At the first hint of heresy she can be relied upon to stride purposeful­ly to the nearest progressiv­e pulpit and start preaching.

From the moment the Labour/ Green ‘‘Budget Responsibi­lity Rules’’ were announced, I knew a scorching sermon from Ms Bradford was only a matter of time. She did not disappoint. Barely 72 hours after Grant Robertson and James Shaw’s blasphemy had sullied the ears of the faithful, she was on

RNZ’s Morning Report castigatin­g her erstwhile comrades with considerab­le passion.

‘‘The Greens have completely sold out on where they started from in my generation of MPs in

1999,’’ she thundered.

‘‘So what you see here is the

Green Party deciding to go after votes on the centre and the right of the New Zealand political spectrum. It wants business in its corner. It wants your National bluegreen voters in its corner.’’

What does this mean? Ms Bradford is in no doubt. It means ‘‘completely abandoning the huge number of people who are in desperate need in the areas of housing, welfare, jobs, and education’’.

There’s a part of me that inclines towards her critique. It’s the part that remembers those original Green MPs, the ‘‘magnificen­t seven’’, as they galloped up the steps of Parliament and on to the floor of the House of Representa­tives like ‘‘an invasion of centaurs’’. (If I may borrow Theodore Roszak’s evocative image.)

Which was great to see. (And even greater to be, Ms Bradford, I’m sure!) But only if your purpose was (borrowing once again from Roszak’s 1969 bestseller The Making of a CounterCul­ture) to embody ‘‘the experience of radical critical disjunctur­e, the clash of irreconcil­able conception­s of life’’. Or, as an oldtime Maoist like Ms Bradford might express it: only if the Greens were there to make revolution.

But even back then, in 1999, the Greens’ revolution­ary faction was in the minority. Alongside Ms Bradford, Keith Locke and Nandor Tanczos, sat Rod Donald, Jeanette Fitzsimons, Sue Kedgely and Ian EwenStreet. Radical and visionary these latter four may have been, but they had come to Parliament to accomplish things, not to turn New Zealand’s capitalist society upside down.

Twenty years later and the Greens are still waiting to fulfil even a small fraction of the Magnificen­t Seven’s agenda. Most members of the Green Party are not interested in being seen as the harbingers of a ‘‘radical critical disjunctur­e’’ but as members of a political party dedicated to finding practical solutions to global warming; cleaning up New Zealand’s lakes, rivers and streams; housing the homeless; and helping to develop a principled and purposeful role for New Zealand on the internatio­nal stage.

For most New Zealand voters, the idea of revolution­ary Green Party centaurs rampaging through Parliament is equally politicall­y uninterest­ing.

So perhaps Ms Bradford should cast her mind back to the 1999 election and recall just how narrow was the margin that separated the Greens from parliament­ary representa­tion and political oblivion. Rod Donald delighted in his white shirt and coloured braces for six years, but by 2005 he was very publicly having himself measured for a stylish Kiwimade business suit. When the brute arithmetic of political power kept him out of Helen Clark’s Cabinet it, quite literally, broke his heart.

‘‘At what price power,’’ Ms Bradford demands ‘‘if you sell out everything that your party was originally set out to achieve? I mean, this Green Party here is following the same trail as green parties all over the world — some of whom have ended up in coalitions and alliance with really rightwing government­s’’.

But in 2014, with just one image, the National Party destroyed the Green Party’s (and Labour’s) hopes of achieving anything for New Zealand. Their depiction of a Red/Green government as an uncoordina­ted and unreliable ‘‘Ship of Fools’’ was devastatin­g.

That’s the public perception that Andrew Little, Grant Robertson, James Shaw and Metiria Turei are up against. And it is the widespread public misgivings about the Left’s economic realism and reliabilit­y that their ‘‘Budget Responsibi­lity Rules’’ are intended to allay.

That’s because powerlessn­ess also comes at a price.

A real revolution­ary would understand the importance of inoculatin­g the two leading parties of the Left against the ‘‘Show me the money!’’ ambushes of elections past.

The Greens are not trying to make a countercul­ture, Ms Bradford — they’re trying to make a government.

❛ Twenty years later and the Greens are still waiting to fulfil even a small fraction of the Magnificen­t Seven’s agenda❜

 ??  ??
 ??  ?? Sue Bradford
Sue Bradford

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand