Otago Daily Times

Kaepernick’s Nike ad reignites debate

-

NEW YORK: Protesters burned their Nike shoes, investors sold shares and some consumers demanded a boycott after the footwear and apparel maker launched an advertisin­g campaign featuring Colin Kaepernick, the NFL quarterbac­k who sparked a national controvers­y by kneeling during the national anthem.

But the brand recognitio­n that comes with the campaign may be just what the company wanted, and marketing experts predicted it would ultimately succeed.

The ad revived a raging debate in the United States that started in 2016 when Kaepernick, then with the San Francisco 49ers, began kneeling to protest multiple police shootings of unarmed black men.

‘‘This is right on the money for Nike. They stand for this irreverent, rebellious attitude. In this case, it’s reinforcin­g the brand,’’ Erich Joachimsth­aler, chief executive of strategy consulting firm Vivaldi, said.

While some fans praised Kaepernick and other players who joined him in kneeling as patriotic dissenters, critics led by US President Donald Trump blasted the protesters as ungrateful and disrespect­ful.

Trump called Nike’s campaign ‘‘a terrible decision’’ in an interview with the Daily Caller published yesterday, but he also showed some respect for Kaepernick’s right to speak out.

‘‘As much as I disagree with the Colin Kaepernick endorsemen­t, in another way . . . it is what this country is all about, that you have certain freedoms to do things that other people think you shouldn’t do,’’ Trump said.

The NFL, which gave in to pressure from Trump and ordered players not to kneel on the field during the anthem, nonetheles­s praised Kaepernick.

‘‘The social justice issues that Colin and other profession­al athletes have raised deserve our attention and action,’’ Jocelyn Moore, the NFL’s executive vicepresid­ent of communicat­ions and public affairs, said.

In the immediate backlash against the campaign, announced on Tuesday, Nike shares fell nearly 4% at one point yesterday and closed down 3.2%.

Calls for a boycott fed social media buzz about the campaign. There were 2.7 million mentions of Nike over the previous 24 hours, the social media analysis firm Talkwalker said yesterday, an increase of 135% over the previous week.

After his protests, Kaepernick could not find a job for the 2017 season and sued the National Football League, accusing owners of colluding to blackball him. He is still without a team.

Nike has sponsored Kaepernick since 2011 and said he will be one of several faces for a campaign marking the 30th anniversar­y of its ‘‘Just Do It’’ slogan.

The ad refers to Kaepernick’s loss of NFL income with the quote: ‘‘Believe in something. Even if it means sacrificin­g everything.’’

Some who were offended by the choice posted social media pictures of Nike shoes they had set on fire or socks with the Nike swoosh cut out.

Athletes including Serena Williams, LeBron James, Kevin Durant and Chris Paul showed support.

Matt Powell, a senior adviser with market research firm NPD Group, predicted the boycott would fizzle.

‘‘Old angry white guys are not a core demographi­c for Nike,’’ he said. — Reuters

 ??  ?? Colin Kaepernick
Colin Kaepernick

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand