Otago Daily Times

MPI open to some ‘modest’ grower claims

- ANDREA FOX

WELLINGTON: The Ministry for Primary Industries (MPI), facing compensati­on claims for more than $1 billion of taxpayer dollars around various biosecurit­y issues, has added the apple and stonefruit sector to its list of potential claimants.

MPI, in a written statement issued minutes after extended High Court interim orders expired around a legal challenge by fruit growers to the ministry’s destructio­n/containmen­t order for 48,000 apple and stonefruit plants, said it was ‘‘open to receiving modest reimbursem­ent claims for some direct and verifiable losses incurred as a result of destroyed or contained plant material’’.

The Government, through MPI, is already subject to up to $800 million of projected claims from dairy and beef cattle farmers for compensati­on under the Biosecurit­y Act for losses incurred by its containmen­t and mass kill response to a Mycoplasma bovis cattle disease incursion, while Stewart Island oyster farmers await major compensati­on for an MPI mass destructio­n order and other MPI biosecurit­y decisions are legally challenged by industry groups.

It is understood MPI has at least 15 biosecurit­y challenges on its plate right now.

The latest claim on taxpayer money from biosecurit­y issues started when MPI issued a directive to 32 apple and stonefruit industry participan­ts in Hawke’s Bay, Waikato, Nelson and Central Otago to destroy or contain 48,000 plants imported from a longtime Washington State University­based quarantine facility provider to the New Zea land fruitgrowi­ng industry.

A group representi­ng apple and stonefruit growers and other fruit industry participan­ts challenged the directive last month, seeking a High Court judicial review.

The group claimed the directive would cost the industry up to $500 million in lost income and would set its innovation progress back by 15 years.

Meanwhile, it said, plants and plant material were dying because they could not be planted or used, and many plants had been destroyed.

The High Court found the legal route taken by MPI to make the containmen­t/destructio­n order was unlawful.

But it noted the thoroughne­ss of MPI’s investigat­ions.

The court recommende­d the parties negotiate a solution — a finding which MPI sought an extension for, and which has now expired.

An MPI statement issued minutes after the deadline said the ministry remained concerned at the potential biosecurit­y risk associated with the imported plant material.

‘‘We’ve now issued new notices under a different section of the Biosecurit­y Act so we can continue to manage potential risk through containmen­t and a spraying and netting programme while we work through a testing plan with each owner,’’ the statement said.

‘‘If no pests or diseases of concern are found then the plant material will be able to be released in the future.

‘‘MPI remains open to receiving modest reimbursem­ent claims for some direct and verifiable losses incurred as a result of destroyed or contained plant material.’’ — NZME

❛ MPI remains open to

receiving modest reimbursem­ent claims for some direct and verifiable losses incurred as a result of destroyed or contained plant material

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand