Otago Daily Times

Dowie's political career looks over

- MIKE HOULAHAN Political reporter mike.houlahan@odt.co.nz

SARAH Dowie’s shortlived political career looks all but over.

The Invercargi­ll MP from 2014 is almost certain not to be a National Party candidate in the 2020 election — assuming she does not resign beforehand.

One of the worstkept secrets in politics was revealed yesterday, when it was confirmed police were investigat­ing a text message, allegedly sent from the phone of Ms Dowie, to former National MP JamiLee Ross.

The text message, which included the words ‘‘You deserve to die’’ was sent in the wake of the end of an extramarit­al relationsh­ip between the two MPs.

Wellinform­ed sources said the affair had caused turmoil in National party circles in Invercargi­ll.

Several members of Ms Dowie’s electorate committee had resigned in recent months, their departures due to Ms Dowie’s behaviour and conduct.

‘‘It doesn’t reflect the values of the National Party,’’ one source said.

The Otago Daily Times understand­s several members of Ms Dowie’s staff have also resigned. She is advertisin­g for staff to work in her Wellington office.

Ms Dowie was not answering her mobile phone yesterday or responding to a text message requesting comment or a statement.

The doors were locked and the lights off at her firstfloor office in Kelvin St , Invercargi­ll.

On one of the doors was a sign informing visitors that the office was closed for the festive season and would only reopen on January 28.

Mr Ross and Ms Dowie were understood to have been in a relationsh­ip for more than two years.

It is believed to have ended about May.

National electorate candidates are selected by the electorate committee, with input from the party board and regional council.

Candidates are required to ‘‘exhibit the skills, experience and commitment to the party values and policies to make them suitable for candidate selection’’, a test sources suggested Ms Dowie would now be unlikely to pass.

A candidate also needs to be approved by the board — and yesterday National’s leader ship was hardly rallying around to support Ms Dowie, refusing to comment on the issue.

Ms Dowie is the daughter of two police officers.

She graduated from the University of Otago, practised in law, and also worked for the Department of Conservati­on.

It is understood she is separated from her husband, former Otago cricketer Mark Billcliff. They have two children.

IT is called ‘‘public life’’ for a reason.

For those in it, it is a life in which their private deeds or comment may be publicly exposed at any time, as former National MP JamiLee Ross and now Invercargi­ll MP Sarah Dowie, with whom he had an affair, know.

Public life used to be synonymous with a dedication of service for the public good.

Now, it is a term more related to risk — the risk of one’s actions being scrutinise­d and made public — and no more so than for members of Parliament.

If people are being put off offering themselves for public life these days because of the level of scrutiny and risks, then so be it.

It comes with the territory, especially in the ultracompe­titive modern media environmen­t.

We know now that the private angry text tirade against Ross sent in August last year from Sarah Dowie’s phone after the affair had ended is being investigat­ed by the police, based on an anonymous complaint about it.

Ross revealed the investigat­ion but The New Zealand Herald decided to publicly reveal the name, without casting judgement on Dowie.

It is highly debatable whether the vitriolic text including the words ‘‘you deserve to die’’ was inciting Ross to end his life. She also incited him to change his hair.

Presumably, the police in their investigat­ion will look at what Ross himself had said or done to her to provoke such abuse and whether it is really fair to highlight one phrase with no context.

But there are no suppressio­n orders in place. And the revelation of a police investigat­ion does not warrant a continuati­on of the selfcensor­ship the media has applied collective­ly to not naming Dowie.

Certainly, if the bare facts of a police investigat­ion had emerged today without the torrid backstory, it is difficult to imagine any media withholdin­g the names of those alleged to be involved.

The real question is not whether she should be named now but why she was not named back in October during Ross’ meltdown and expulsion from National.

By and large the New Zealand media is not too intrusive.

The unwritten rule in political journalism that affairs are not written about unless a) it is a known fact and b) that it has had an impact on the job and/or the party.

That test was clearly met in the case of Ross, because last October he revealed the affair himself, in the context of claims he had treated women badly which in turn, he said, had led to a mental breakdown which had led to his medical leave from his job — before he was accused of being the disloyal leaker of Bridges’ travel expenses to Newshub.

He did not mention Dowie in the lengthy live press conference­s he held that week which the public were glued to, although he did name her in a prerecorde­d interview with Newstalk ZB, which the station decided to withhold.

Even when the existence of the text became known through the Whaleoil blog site shortly after Ross was sectioned, she was not named — except in the comments section.

There was no collective decision by media not to publish her name but collective­ly, the media did not. And there were plenty of other aspects of the unfolding story on which to concentrat­e.

After Newsroom published a series of stories by women (unnamed but widely understood to include Dowie) setting out what they felt were ghastly experience­s at the hands of a manipulati­ve Ross, Dowie came to be regarded as a victim.

The Me Too mindset prevailing last year was an added protection for Dowie.

Certainly, National had reason to try to protect Dowie from the sort of pressure that Ross was facing at the time, and to contain the scandal.

But the media’s obligation, at essence, is to disclose unless there is a good reason not to. The revelation this week by Ross about the police investigat­ion into the text was a fitting time to exercise that obligation.

Dowie, formerly an Invercargi­ll lawyer, should be able to survive politicall­y if she wants to stay in politics and gives her electorate the respect it deserves.

It is entitled to know she was a key player in a political scandal and that she is the subject of a police investigat­ion.

Dowie certainly has a better chance of political survival than JamiLee Ross.

His lengthy statement this week before reentering public life weeps with remorse over the destructio­n of his career.

But some of the agonising detail contains a hint of someone who is not yet over the crisis — details for example about what was running through his mind (images of his 3yearold daughter) as he stood on those Waikato railway tracks wondering whether to end it all, before police found him.

And he still seems to be looking to blame others for his misfortune, albeit in a less frenzied way than last year.

He apologises and forgives in equal measure but paints himself as a victim, as someone who spoke truth to power — for example, telling Bridges that he was not popular, of a heartless texter ‘‘telling me to kill myself,’’ and as someone apparently not treated fairly when he was accused of leaking Bridges’ travel expenses.

Bizarrely, he is modelling himself on Nelson Mandela who left Robben Island after 27 years with no bitterness.

In many ways, Ross’ statement can be seen as a veiled plea to his colleagues not to expel him from Parliament.

In private letters to them he reminds them that he knows where their skeletons are buried from his previous job as senior whip, while promising to keep those secrets.

The really positive thing about Ross’ statement is his advocacy for mental health awareness. In the short term, that is where he has the most potential to rehabilita­te himself with the public.

Perhaps he sees himself as a latterday Maurice Williamson, who was suspended from the caucus under Bill English and reinstated under the next leader.

Ross thinks he is ready to resume public life. The public will be the judge of that in due course. — The New Zealand Herald

 ??  ?? Sarah Dowie
Sarah Dowie
 ??  ?? Sarah Dowie
Sarah Dowie
 ??  ?? JamiLee Ross
JamiLee Ross

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand