Otago Daily Times

Airport company cleared to acquire disputed land

- TRACEY ROXBURGH

QUEENSTOWN Airport Corporatio­n has been cleared to acquire a contentiou­s piece of land, known as Lot 6, which has tied up court time for more than eight years.

The latest decision in the longrunnin­g battle between the airport and Remarkable­s Park Ltd over the 16ha of land was released by Environmen­t Court Judge Jane Borthwick on March 1.

Lot 6 runs along the airport’s southern boundary and is owned by Remarkable­s Park.

The airport company, wanting to expand its facilities, issued a notice to take the land under the Public Works Act 1991.

Remarkable­s Park lodged an objection with the Environmen­t Court but Judge Borthwick ruled in the airport’s favour.

Airport chief executive Colin Keel said this now allowed the airport company ‘‘to move to the next phase of the acquisitio­n process’’.

The parties still had to agree on a price for the land, through a negotiated settlement outside the Public Works Act.

Should agreement not be reached, compensati­on would be determined by the Land Valuation Tribunal.

Remarkable­s Park director Alastair Porter did not respond to a request for comment by deadline.

The developmen­t company’s objection centered on the airport’s ‘‘uncertaint­y’’ and the impact that had on its master planning; and an expectatio­n the airport would use its land for airport purposes.

Remarkable­s Park contended two of the three options in the airport’s master plan discussion document, released in 2017, contemplat­ed relocating the terminal to increase capacity to 5.1 million passengers a year which, it submitted, was a ‘‘change in circumstan­ces’’.

Judge Borthwick said Remarkable­s Park had ‘‘assumed, without proof’’ the airport would, or must, accommodat­e growth in passengers beyond 3.2 million,

‘‘We make no such assumption.’’

Lot 6 had once been owned by the airport and was exchanged with Remarkable­s Park for land to the north.

Remarkable­s Park argued taking the land back was ‘‘extremely unfair’’ and the airport company QAC had now essentiall­y ‘‘changed its mind’’.

It contended it would be ‘‘procedural­ly unfair’’ for the land to be taken until the airport knew more about how it would respond to future passenger growth prediction­s.

Judge Borthwick found the notice to take was ‘‘fair’’ because it was sound and reasonably necessary, ‘‘if not essential’’, for the airport to achieve its objectives.

She also found ‘‘the power to take’’ was not being used to enable commercial developmen­t of the passenger terminal site and determined the acquisitio­n could be pursued.

There was ‘‘no evidence’’ to suggest the process had been procedural­ly unfair.

In a separate decision, issued on March 5, she ordered Remarkable­s Park to pay $52,371 to Queenstown Airport Corporatio­n and $19,830.06 to the Queenstown Lakes District Council, relating to Remarkable­s Park’s appeal to the High Court.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand