Otago Daily Times

MBIE proposes buildingwo­rk cover

- PAUL MCBETH

WELLINGTON: People building new houses will need to get insurance or a guarantee to protect themselves from faulty work if proposals contained in the Government’s proposed raft of buildingla­w reforms go ahead.

The proposal could push up the immediate cost of building by 1% but may be worth it for the extra protection provided and the lower overall cost expected should something go wrong, the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment says in a discussion document.

A compulsory regime was rejected, officials saying it would be a significan­t interventi­on relative to the problem created by apportioni­ng costs in the event of constructi­on faults such as the ‘‘leaky building’’ syndrome.

The guarantee plan was among a raft of proposals Building and Constructi­on Minister Jenny Salesa unveiled earlier this month as part of a major reform of building law spanning building products, risk and liability, penalties, the building levy and occupation­al regulation.

It would require homeowners to take out a guarantee or insurance product for new builds or significan­t renovation­s. An optout option would be available for owners wanting to manage their own risk.

MBIE favours homeowners holding the policy because so many building firms go bust. Just 22% of those set up in 2008 were still operating more than a decade later, according to new research published with the discussion paper. About 53% of new builds and 23% of renovation­s are covered by insurance or guarantees at present.

Guarantees typically provide assurance that if something goes wrong it will be fixed, whereas insurance products offer compensati­on for loss and provide greater protection to a homeowner.

Covec, a consultanc­y that undertook some of the research for MBIE, estimates building problems cost about $85 million a year, of which guarantees and insurance cover about $40 million. Making them compulsory would shift some of that cost from a small number of homeowners and spread it across the entire market, it said.

The Master Build guarantee on work done by Registered Master Builders Associatio­n members is the dominant product, accounting for 10,000 of the 16,500 new properties covered and 2000 of 6500 renovation­s. The Covec report said the associatio­n planned to move to an insuranceb­acked scheme.

One of the issues MBIE wanted canvassed was an analysis of existing products in New Zealand following the collapse of insurer CBL Corp, which previously underwrote the BuiltIn Homefirst Guarantee, a 10year warranty. Since CBL’s failure, BuiltIn resells Stamford Insurance on slightly different terms and pricing.

Covec said the size of the building work guarantee and insurance product market was small relative to other insurance markets. While Stamford has expressed a willingnes­s to cover the entire market with an insuranceb­acked scheme, that was not a certainty. It could also leave Stamford as the sole supplier, raising the risk of market power and higher prices as a result, Covec said.

The consultanc­y suggested MBIE seriously consider direct government involvemen­t as a potential provider, ‘‘especially if further discussion­s with the industry suggest full coverage is unlikely or if extension to cover the whole market would be unlikely to be done efficientl­y — through differenti­al riskbased pricing’’.

MBIE said introducin­g a government scheme would be too expensive and did not match the size of risk being managed.

‘‘While homeowners would be covered, it would crowd out the private market for guarantee and insurance products,’’ MBIE said.

The ministry said providers had been reluctant to enter the local guarantee and insurance product market for a number of reasons, including patchy performanc­e internatio­nally and their ‘‘long tail’’ of liability, where a oneoff premium is paid upfront for decadelong cover.

‘‘This can be a significan­t liability for providers and they can find it hard to take steps to manage those risks, such as raising premiums or declining cover,’’ MBIE said.

With the products estimated to cost about 1% of a total build, that amounted to a potential premium pool of only about $200 million, MBIE said.

Reserve Bank figures show annualised gross earned premiums across the country’s largest insurers was $9.98 billion at the end of the December quarter. —BusinessDe­sk

 ?? PHOTO: GETTY IMAGES ?? Protection . . . A guarantee plan is among a raft of proposals for new homes; pictured, house frames going up in a large home build.
PHOTO: GETTY IMAGES Protection . . . A guarantee plan is among a raft of proposals for new homes; pictured, house frames going up in a large home build.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand