Otago Daily Times

For power’s sake: great power mania infects all

- GWYNNE DYER Gwynne Dyer is an independen­t London journalist.

‘‘GREAT nations do not fight endless wars,’’ said Donald Trump in his State of the Union speech last February, but he was wrong. That’s exactly what they do. Great powers fight MORE wars than anybody else, even if, like the United States today, they have no hostile neighbours.

The original observatio­ns were made half a century ago by Quincy Wright, an American political scientist at the University of Chicago. During the entire history of ‘‘modern’’ Europe from 1480 to 1940, he calculated, there had been about 2600 important battles.

France, a leading military power for the whole period and the greatest power for most of it, participat­ed in 47% of those battles — more than a thousand major battles. Russia, Britain and Germany (in the form of Prussia), which were all great European powers by 1700, fought in between 22% and 25% of them. And then the rate of participat­ion falls off very steeply.

Spain was a great military power until the mid1700s, but then dropped out of contention and can offer only a 12% attendance record for battles over the whole four and ahalf centuries.

The Netherland­s and Sweden, which were great military powers only for brief periods, were present at only 8% and 4% of Europe’s battles respective­ly. Indeed, Sweden has not used its army in war for 190 years now.

There is a steep and consistent gradient of suffering, in which the most powerful nations fight most often and lose most heavily in terms of lives and wealth. How can this be? Why doesn’t great power deter other

countries from fighting you?

Well, it actually does, to some extent. However, great power also enables the country possessing it to acquire ‘‘interests’’ everywhere, and tempts it to use its military power to protect or advance those interests. Only great powers fight ‘‘wars of choice’’.

North Vietnam did not choose to fight the United States. Neither did Cuba, Grenada, Libya, Panama, Serbia, or Iraq. Nor, for that matter, did Canada (then British North America) in 1812, or Mexico in 1846, or Spain in 1898. Those were all ‘‘wars of choice’’ for the United States, but not for the other side.

This is not to say that they were all wars of aggression. The first Gulf War was not, for example, nor was the Kosovo War. But they were all wars that the United States could have chosen NOT to fight without suffering grave harm to its own legitimate interests. It chose to fight them, often for relatively minor stakes, because it could.

The greatpower mania infects everybody. Donald Trump, despite his wellfounde­d conviction that America should bring its troops home from the Middle East, has now vetoed a bipartisan Congressio­nal resolution that tried to force an end to American participat­ion in the war in Yemen.

Why would Trump, like several generation­s of American ‘‘statesmen’’ before him, fall for the bizarre notion that deciding who rules in Lebanon or Egypt or Yemen is a ‘‘vital national interest’’ of the United States?

The webs of spurious logic that support such nonsense are familiar. ‘‘Oil is our vital national interest, so Saudi Arabia is our indispensa­ble ally.’’ Why? Wouldn’t Arabia want to sell its oil to the US under any imaginable regime? And hasn’t fracking made the US virtually selfsuffic­ient in oil anyway?

‘‘Since Saudi Arabia is our ally, we must support its war in Yemen, and support it against Iran too.’’ Why? You managed to be closely allied with both Israel and Saudi Arabia back in the days when the Saudis still saw Israel as a mortal enemy. You don’t have to back either of them in everything they do.

‘‘Our credibilit­y is at stake.’’ This is the lastresort falsehood that can justify almost any otherwise indefensib­le military commitment. Don’t let them see you back down, no matter how stupid your position is.

They won’t respect you if you bail out.

Or as Trump put it when he was still just a candidate for the Republican nomination: ‘‘Our military dominance must be unquestion­ed, and I mean unquestion­ed, by anybody and everybody.’’

Power purely for the sake of power. Any country that remains a great power for long enough eventually becomes insane.

 ?? PHOTO: TNS ?? More than 16,000 French soldiers are buried in the Douaumont Cemetery near Verdun. French military forces took part in more than 1000 major battles in the history of ‘‘modern’’ Europe.
PHOTO: TNS More than 16,000 French soldiers are buried in the Douaumont Cemetery near Verdun. French military forces took part in more than 1000 major battles in the history of ‘‘modern’’ Europe.
 ?? PHOTO: REUTERS ?? Kuwaiti citizens walk along the Basra highway back to Kuwait after the end of the Gulf War in 1991.
PHOTO: REUTERS Kuwaiti citizens walk along the Basra highway back to Kuwait after the end of the Gulf War in 1991.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand