Otago Daily Times

Harbour projects ‘delayed’

- JOHN LEWIS john.lewis@odt.co.nz

THE economic impact of the Covid19 pandemic has prompted the Dunedin City Council to put the city’s waterfront developmen­t project, including the controvers­ial bridge, on hold.

The decision was confirmed by councillor­s during the nonpublic part of Monday’s Dunedin City Council meeting and that decision was made public last night.

On October 30, the city was awarded $19.9 million from the Provincial Growth Fund (PGF) to help pay for the first stage of transforma­tion work on Dunedin’s waterfront.

The conditiona­l funding agreement was to pay for ground works, building platforms, public realm treatments and seawall upgrades needed for the project to proceed, but the details of the agreement were still being finalised when the Covid19 lockdown came into force.

Dunedin Mayor Aaron Hawkins said the decision to put the project on hold meant the council would withdraw from the Provincial Growth Fund process for now.

‘‘The waterfront vision was one of a number of transforma­tional projects the council has been working to progress.

‘‘What sets it apart from things like the Central City Plan is that it was always seen as public funding that would drive significan­t private investment.

‘‘In the current economic climate, those odds have got far longer, so we’re going to push pause on this until the economy improves.’’

Mr Hawkins said the project had only been delayed, and stressed the vision for the waterfront remained.

‘‘This is a delay, not a death knell,’’ the mayor said.

Because the idea was to build a platform for the University of Otago and other businesses to build on top of, interested parties were consulted.

He said those parties were ‘‘comfortabl­e’’ with the decision to delay.

The Government was also advised the DCC would seek to reengage with the PGF process later, and in the meantime would progress design and consenting processes ‘‘as far as practicabl­e’’, while avoiding unnecessar­y cost.

The aim would be to ensure further delays could be avoided when the project and associated developmen­t might continue.

Mr Hawkins said it was impossible to say how long the project would be delayed.

‘‘If I had that kind of foresight, I’d probably be in a different line of work. It’s anybody’s guess at this point, as to how long it’s going to take the economy to recover to the point that we were at before Covid.

‘‘It was a project that was born out of more buoyant times.

‘‘It’s hard to say with a clear conscience that it’s still likely within the next 12 months.’’

The decision to withdraw from PGF also meant work on the waterfront bridge had been put on hold, pending a report to council on the future of the project.

He expected the report to come to the council in August, and the $20 million set aside for the waterfront bridge would be discussed at a council meeting today.

‘‘That will be discussed along with everything else in our capital works programme for the 202021 year.

‘‘The decision made yesterday [Monday] will no doubt inform that decision, but nothing has been decided in terms of what happens to that project.

‘‘It’s up for debate in the next few days.’’

Mr Hawkins also said he could not say how much had been spent on the project so far, but said that anything spent would not be lost.

‘‘All the work done up until this point will still be of value when we’re once again in a position to carry on from where we left off.’’

 ?? PHOTO: ANIMATION RESEARCH ?? Architectu­re Van Brandenbur­g's proposal for developmen­t of the Steamer Basin area.
PHOTO: ANIMATION RESEARCH Architectu­re Van Brandenbur­g's proposal for developmen­t of the Steamer Basin area.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand