Otago Daily Times

Building homes nearby unwise, orchardist tells council

- KERRIE WATERWORTH kerrie.waterworth@odt.co.nz

PUTTING about 140 homes in the vicinity of cherry orchards ‘‘was not a good fit’’ and would cause problems, a submitter opposed to plan change 14 told a remotely held Central Otago District Council hearing yesterday.

Alan McKay, representi­ng the McKay Family Trust, said he was opposed to plan change 14 which, if granted, would allow NZ Cherry Corp (Leyser)

Limited Partnershi­p to go ahead with a residentia­l lot subdivisio­n and a 29ha, multimilli­ondollar orchard expansion.

Speaking via video link, Mr McKay told independen­t commission­er panel chairman Neil Gillespie and independen­t commission­er Gary Rae orchardrel­ated noise and changes to the surroundin­g rural landscape were his two main objections.

Mr McKay said he lived on a 20ha block and grew cherries but had gone to a ‘‘great deal of trouble to reduce the noise’’ by using electric motors instead of diesel, covering the trees, having a 100m buffer and a wellinsula­ted house.

However, he said noise from wind machines and frost fans on neighbouri­ng orchards often kept him awake at night.

The people living in the residentia­l developmen­t would complain bitterly, and ‘‘we would gradually see the erosion of our rights to operate our orchards’’, he said.

Former Otago regional councillor Gerry Eckhoff told the hearing he had lived beside an orchard for seven years that used birds scarers and frost fans.

‘‘Try leaving a motor mower at full throttle outside your bedroom window at night and that will give you an indication of the noise.’’

He said everyone had a right to quiet enjoyment of their property and that was a fundamenta­l principle he did not believe could be compromise­d.

Central Otago viticultur­alist and Grape Vision Ltd owner James Dicey submitted written evidence as an expert and a resident, but yesterday he also gave evidence on behalf of Residents for Responsibl­e Developmen­t Cromwell.

He said, from a viticultur­al perspectiv­e, the site in question was productive land.

Based on his desktop research, there was enough water for 87ha to be planted successful­ly with cherries and 105ha of land would be suitable for viticultur­e.

He urged the commission­ers to make a physical visit to get a sense of the value and site analysis of the land.

The hearing is set to continue until Friday.

The commission­ers indicated they intended to make a twoday site visit next month.

❛ Try leaving a motor mower at full throttle outside your bedroom window at night and that will give you an

indication of the noise

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand