Otago Daily Times

WEB OF DECEIT

- MIKE HOULAHAN

PERHAPS the most surprising thing about Barry Kloogh’s Ponzi scheme is that it was not detected earlier.

Kloogh — now struck off as a financial adviser — created hundreds of fictitious investment­s for his unfortunat­e clients, who were lulled into a false sense of security by seeing the names of deposits held in blue chip companies when reading the statements he provided for them.

However, almost all the assets listed on those statements never existed.

Court documents released on Friday — when Kloogh was imprisoned for eight years, 10 months with a minimum period to be served of five years and four months after a hearing in the Dunedin District Court — set out how some of the 81 victims identified so far were defrauded.

Much of the $15.7 million estimated to have been stolen by Kloogh through his firm, Impact Enterprise­s Ltd, was taken using a ruse only the deeply suspicious might have rumbled.

The money Kloogh’s clients trusted him to invest for them was meant to have been deposited with Consillium — a custodial ‘‘investment wrap’’ service which bundled together different investment­s belonging to the same customer for ease of management.

However, the money seldom went to Consillium.

Not being a licensed broker, Kloogh was not permitted to receive money from clients — when they either wrote him cheques or made transfers via internet banking, they usually paid ‘‘Consillium’’.

However, the bank’s system allowed Kloogh to designate a trading name for his company’s accounts — a function he used to name IEL’s three main accounts after Consillium and two other trading portfolios.

It was IEL’s bank account number, not that of Consillium, that clients were generally given.

Customers were meant to be given a password to access the platform so they could monitor their investment­s but — crucially — Kloogh told few, if any, of his clients that Consillium’s site offered that function.

Instead, Kloogh sent statements to clients which detailed investment­s he claimed to have made on their behalf.

Almost every victim of Kloogh spoken to by the ODT has a story to tell about ringing the bank or finance company they thought had their money, only to be told it had no record of their existence.

Kloogh had good records of his customers’ profits and losses, ironically due to a function on the Consillium website.

The site allowed Kloogh to enter the ‘‘external investment­s’’ he claimed to have bought for his clients.

‘‘It meant that I knew that that money was owed. Nearly every external investment in that portfolio was misappropr­iated,’’ Kloogh told investigat­ors.

If a customer wanted their money back, Kloogh would transfer money from IEL’s account to his Consillium trust account, so it looked like it had been deposited by a client.

Consillium would then credit the withdrawin­g client’s account, unwittingl­y believing it was simply returning to the people concerned their own money.

‘‘If a person had said ‘Oh look, we need $50,000 for a vehicle’, I’d go ‘Oh my God I’ve got to get more money in’ and that’s how I’d actually get the funds in,’’ Kloogh told investigat­ors.

‘‘It astounded me that they [the bank] would allow me to change who the payer was. So the payer could be changed to Consillium so it would look as if it was coming from FNZ Consillium.

‘‘And vice versa, I could put money into the Consillium account and it looks like it was coming from the client.’’

Occasional­ly, he would sell a genuine asset from a Consillium account and pay the proceeds into a customer’s account.

Kloogh would then ring to say he had accidental­ly put money into their account, and ask for it to be transferre­d to the ‘‘correct’’ account.

Some customers transferre­d money two or three times to fix Kloogh’s ‘‘mistakes’’.

Kloogh was eventually caught after his accountant spotted a discrepanc­y in the accounts and alerted authoritie­s.

 ??  ?? Barry Kloogh
Barry Kloogh

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand