Group wants electoral system poll
THE man leading the First Past the Post Working Group in Dunedin says he is more interested in choice than change.
Group chairman Pablo Dennison said he was disappointed the Dunedin City Council last month opted to retain the single transferable vote system used in the city since the 2004 council election.
His small, recently started working group had already gathered more than 1000 signatures supporting holding a poll on the way the city voted, Mr Dennison said.
Despite the name of the fourweek old group, the poll would be about giving the voters a chance to say whether they wanted a change to the way voting was done in Dunedin rather than agreeing to support a firstpastthepost system.
‘‘My thing is it’s not about what system is better than the other, it’s about us having a chance to decide for ourselves.’’
The group had three core members — Mr Dennison and city centre retailers Sue Todd and Brent Weatherall — but the group’s petition was available to sign in hard copy in more than a dozen businesses across Dunedin.
He hoped to gather more than 5000 signatures before the end of the year.
The council, in a full council meeting on July 28, decided to stick with the single transferable vote system, where rather than voting for one candidate alone, voters list in order their preference of candidates, voting for as few, or as many, candidates as they like.
The council did not decide to hold a poll on the issue, but under section 29 of the Local Electoral Act more than 5% of those enrolled as eligible to vote at the previous election — in Dunedin’s case 4674 voters — could demand a poll.
This would be held to decide on one of the two electoral systems to be used at the next two triennial elections of the local authority and its community boards.
Mr Dennison said he wanted regular polls on the city’s preferred electoral system.
In an attached report to the council paper, among the advantages listed of each system socalled ‘‘tactical’’ voting is said to be possible in the firstpastthepost system, voters being able prevent a candidate from winning in some circumstances.
In single transferable vote systems tactical voting is ‘‘virtually impossible’’ and voters instead are encouraged to express their ‘‘true preferences’’.