Otago Daily Times

Doctor publicly rebuked in UK protected in NZ

- ANUSHA BRADLEY

AUCKLAND: The identity of a doctor, publicly censured and temporaril­y suspended in Britain for faking a qualificat­ion from the University of Otago, can never be revealed in New Zealand.

The Health Practition­ers Disciplina­ry Tribunal in New Zealand has ordered permanent name suppressio­n after it found her guilty of profession­al misconduct for ‘‘falsifying’’ a qualificat­ion.

That is despite her being publicly censured by the UK’s Medical Practition­ers Tribunal Service over the same issue.

The doctor, who was working as an orthopaedi­c registrar in New Zealand at the time, applied for registrati­on with the General Medical Council in the United Kingdom in 2017 in order to complete her specialist training there, stating on her CV she obtained a diploma in surgical anatomy from Otago University in 2011.

But she had only completed three of the four required papers for the diploma, a fact confirmed in a letter sent to her by the university.

When asked by the council to submit her qualificat­ions for checking, the doctor ‘‘digitally altered’’ the document from the university to say she had completed ‘‘all of the four papers’’ and emailed it in.

When the falsificat­ion was discovered by the GMC upon checking with Otago University, the doctor admitted she had made a ‘‘tremendous­ly poor choice’’ to amend the original certificat­e to imply she had completed the diploma, citing stress and family circumstan­ces for influencin­g her actions.

The council charged her with profession­al misconduct, and following a hearing by its Medical Practition­ers Tribunal Service she was publicly censured and suspended from practising in the UK for nine months between April and October 2019. The decision by the MPTS is publicly available and names the doctor.

The council then alerted the Medical Council of New Zealand to her misconduct in the UK, and because the offending took place in this country, it also charged her with profession­al misconduct.

Despite being suspended from practice in the UK, the doctor continued to work in New Zealand without restrictio­n until she was found guilty of misconduct by the Health Practition­ers Disciplina­ry Tribunal in December, following a hearing in Napier.

As she was due to start a new job in the new year, she was suspended for one month from December 13, fined $3000, ordered to pay 30% of the hearing’s costs, and given permanent name suppressio­n.

For the next two years she must also tell every employer about the charge and undergo mentoring.

The HPDT decision was issued in March, but only published recently because of delays caused by Covid19. It said the tribunal found the doctor’s lies about her qualificat­ion ‘‘fell well short of the ethical and profession­al standards set for the profession’’.

But it also said her onemonth suspension in New Zealand was adequate given the ninemonth suspension imposed in the UK which ‘‘has had a punitive effect on her medical career’’.

No patients were harmed because of her actions, noting she had no need to falsify her qualificat­ion from Otago University in the first place.

‘‘Ironically, Dr E did not need to falsify the documents, as in all likelihood she would have met the requiremen­ts for qualificat­ions and experience to be registered with the GMC.’’

‘‘There is no question as to her competence. Her conduct, while dishonest, did not prejudice public health or safety’’.

The doctor now works as a GP in Hawke’s Bay, but her identity, place of work, or the town she practices in can never be revealed.

The Medical Council of New Zealand said it could not say how many doctors working in New Zealand had been censured by the Medical Practition­ers Tribunal Service in the UK, and it declined to comment on the tribunal’s decision to grant the doctor name suppressio­n when she had been publicly censured in the UK.

One of its responsibi­lities was to ensure doctors were competent and fit to practice before gaining registrati­on in this country, a spokesman said.

‘‘There are a number of ways we ensure this — primarily through the requiremen­t for each doctor to provide a Certificat­e of Profession­al Status (Cops) as part of the registrati­on process.

‘‘We obtain Cops from each country where a doctor has worked. A Cops will provide informatio­n about a doctor’s competence and conduct history. We also request doctors complete a disclosure, and answer a number of questions in their applicatio­n for registrati­on.’’

According to decisions issued by the tribunal, 10 of the 20 medical practition­ers found guilty of profession­al misconduct between April 2018 and April 2020 were granted name suppressio­n. — RNZ

❛ Ironically, Dr E did not

need to falsify the documents, as in all likelihood she would have met the requiremen­ts for qualificat­ions and experience

to be registered with the GMC. There is no question as

to her competence. Her conduct, while dishonest, did not prejudice public health or

safety.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand