Otago Daily Times

NZ fertility rate at lowest figure ever

- TRACY NEAL

WELLINGTON: New Zealand has just recorded its lowest fertility rate.

The latest quarterly data from Stats NZ showed the ratio of births to the number of women of childbeari­ng age was now 1.63 — well below the 2.1 ratio needed to keep the population growing.

Or, below the number needed for a woman to replace herself, and her partner.

What that translated to, is that without migration, the population would join others around the world that are shrinking.

In the year to September 2019, more than 59,000 babies were born in New Zealand.

In the year to this September, 1300 fewer were born.

The downward trend was not a blip on the radar — it has been a trend over the past decade, Kim Dunstan, a senior demographe­r with Stats NZ, said.

‘‘They’ve shown a steady decline since about 2010, when the total fertility rate was about 2.2 births per woman.’’

He said reasons were less about biology than social and economic factors.

The trend was likely to be influenced by the rising cost and shortage of housing, which is reflected in the data that shows the decline was greatest among those aged under 35.

‘‘Fertility rates among older women though — 35 to 50 years remain relatively the same as they were a decade ago.’’

Mr Dunstan said involuntar­y infertilit­y — that included men — could also be a factor.

‘‘But generally, the trend we’re seeing in New Zealand and in other countries around the world is around voluntary choice to have children, or not, and for those having children it’s about the number they have over their lifetime.’’

A research associate at the National Institute of Demographi­c and Economic Analysis said the latest figures were a big drop on the same time last year.

Natalie Jackson said there was a technical explanatio­n: more people in the country — because the data covered the period since ‘‘Covid came into our lives and played havoc with overseas travel’’.

‘‘The fertility rate is essentiall­y a ratio of births to the number of women aged 1549 years, and there will have been a lot of women in that age group unable to leave the country, and a reasonable number at those ages returning.’’

Dr Jackson said those figures combined would have increased the number of women, against which the number of births was measured.

‘‘At the same time there have been fewer births, so — fewer births and more women, means the rate will have dropped along the lines it has.’’

But those on the front line were not noticing much change. Midwives were just as busy, New Zealand College of Midwives chief executive Alison Eddy said.

‘‘What the data showed was about 1300 births less this year compared to last year, but when you spread that across the geography of New Zealand, it really doesn’t equate to much at all,’’ Ms Eddy said.

‘‘We have approximat­ely 1300 midwives working in the community as lead maternity carers so you could say that on average, they may have looked after one less woman each.’’

Mr Dunstan said that while the latest data was influenced by Covid19, it remained to be seen what next year’s results would be.

‘‘Until next year it won’t be clear what direct impact the pandemic has had on couple’s childbeari­ng decisions.’’

He said the fall could continue if the job market and economy kept deterring people from having children. — RNZ

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand