Otago Daily Times

Far fewer than 2.1m receive payment

-

WELLINGTON: The Government is coming under further pressure over its costoflivi­ng payment rollout — this time because it has reached far fewer people than advertised.

The National Party has been criticisin­g the payment to nonbenefic­iary New Zealanders earning under $70,000 a year, after reports people living overseas had been given the first $116 instalment.

Revenue Minister David Parker said on Monday the Government did not know how many ineligible people might have received the payment.

In a statement Inland Revenue (IRD) said yesterday it did not have a firm estimate of how many people overseas might have received it.

‘‘We base someone’s eligibilit­y on the informatio­n we hold at the time of assessing their eligibilit­y.

‘‘In some instances, residentia­l informatio­n may be out of date if customers haven’t advised us they have left New Zealand.’’

Since it announced the payment in the Budget in May, the Government has consistent­ly claimed more than 2.1 million people would be eligible; IRD yesterday confirmed just over 1.4 million had so far met the eligibilit­y criteria. Of those, just over 1.3 million had received it.

Some 137,000 missed out because IRD did not have bank account informatio­n for them.

National finance spokeswoma­n Nicola Willis said the Government was being misleading with the 2.1 million figure.

‘‘Ministers need to account for themselves in that regard and I want to know why they aren’t across the details of this.

‘‘All they’re doing is shoving money out the door without regard to who’s actually receiving it.’’

She would not say Mr Parker should be removed from the revenue portfolio, only that he should ‘‘take responsibi­lity’’.

‘‘Ultimately it will be up to the Prime Minister to determine what ministeria­l mistakes have been made here.’’

Ms Willis said she would be writing to the auditorgen­eral calling for an investigat­ion.

However, Mr Parker was adamant the payment would — eventually — reach about 2.1 million people.

‘‘The 2.1 [million] number remains correct, but people don’t become eligible until they’ve filed their tax return and provided other informatio­n to Inland Revenue, so don’t take the bait on people who say that the 1.3 million is the total. It’s not and it was never going to be.’’

The shortfall, he said, was because people were only eligible if they earned $70,000 or less in the year ended March 31.

‘‘Obviously, Inland Revenue can only calculate that after people file their tax return.

‘‘For most people now that is done automatica­lly, but people on IR3 returns and the like file on a different timetable, as do some people who use tax agents, but that’s always been known,’’ he said.

He was comfortabl­e with the errors on the margins.

‘‘We obviously prefer if there’s none, but the only alternativ­e is wasting money on further administra­tive costs that would cost more.

‘‘So, yes, I’m confident that [Inland] Revenue and the Government have chosen to do it in the right way.’’

He put a red line under National’s tax cuts proposal, saying it would give much more money to those overseas, and less to those who needed it, than Labour’s.

‘‘The National Party would have you believe that their alternativ­e, which was tax cuts of tens of thousands of dollars for chief executives and $2 a week to someone on the minimum wage, is better than what we’re doing.’’

IRD said it would run eligibilit­y checks every day and ‘‘we expect the number of people meeting the eligibilit­y criteria to increase towards the 2.1 million over time’’. — RNZ

❛ All they’re doing is shoving money out the door without regard to who’s actually receiving it

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand