Motel housing came With warning children’s wellbeing
Ministers told a year ago of risks to public safety in emergency housing policy
Emergency housing has been described as dangerous and terrifying for some, with families mixed in with gang members and many places rife with crime and intimidation.
Official documents show ministers were warned about the “risks to public safety” in Rotorua a year ago, and that week-by-week motel accommodation is not so suitable for families, or those with high needs.
Official documents provided to National MP Nicola Willis show ministers were told last April the concentration of some “lower-end emergency housing special needs grant motels and the night shelter in the CBD [were] creating risks to public safety” and “individuals are not getting the support they need”.
‘Risk to public safety’ in Rotorua
“It’s slowly killing our town, I’ve never seen Rotorua so bad, so ugly, in all my life”, says the owner of Hennessy’s Irish Bar in Rotorua, Reg Hennessy.
He says he’s seeing “crime, drugs getting sold openly on the street, gangsters, youth gangs” and while he supports those in genuine need being housed, there are “some horrible, horrible things going on out there”.
“When you walk past a motel on Fenton St and you see Mongrel Mob colours hanging up in the windows, showing off so the whole world can see it, it doesn’t make me proud to belong to Rotorua any more.”
With customers sitting in the bar’s outside area he’s seen people “walk along and reach over and grab a steak off someone’s plate, I’ve seen them walk along, grab a person’s packet of cigarettes or jump over the barriers and grab people’s phones”.
He described the situation for the children as “an . . . absolutely disgustingly unhealthy environment”.
“And for the council and the Government to say, we’re going to do something about it and not do something about it is just beyond . . . these are just little kids.”
Tiny Deane from Visions of a Helping Hand in Rotorua runs motels for those in need, many from gangs, with the aim of getting them into permanent housing. He says support to turn people’s lives around, with strict rules and social workers and security onsite, makes a big difference.
“No drugs, no alcohol, no visitors” — hard and fast rules, says Deane.
“Any fighting, you’re evicted, drugs found, you’re evicted, alcohol found, you’re evicted.”
A few have been shown the door, he says, but not “for ages . . . because everyone knows our kaupapa”.
Nine times out of 10, Deane says the wha¯ nau in the motels “choose the right pathway”. “At the end of the day we say kids come first here, always.”
any any
“Alcoholics, drug addicts, gang affiliations, drug deals”
One Auckland charitable trust says some residents are especially vulnerable
to sexual violence, which may only become apparent in the future.
Causing further consternation is the Social Development Ministry’s approach of leaving it up to the moteliers to make sure there’s no violence, harassment or criminal behaviour, and responding only when an incident has occurred.
Using motels to get people off the streets and out of their cars was started by the previous National Government; during last year’s lockdown government agencies mobilised to get rough sleepers off the street but the demand for short-term, urgent housing keeps rising. The Government now spends $1 million a day on emergency and transitional housing.
Alarming stories keep emerging about life for many, with a major concern that families with children are being housed near drug dealers and sex offenders, with no support.
An Auckland mum of four young children lived in emergency housing for eight months, but they’ve recently moved into a private rental.
As well as the room being cockroach-infested, she says in one
place there were “alcoholics, drug addicts, gang affiliations, drug deals . . . my kids witnessed a few domestic violence relationships”.
She called police once where “the lady was actually smashing up the motel room windows” but they only turned up two days later.
Island Child Charitable Trust’s chief executive in Auckland, Danielle Bergin, recalls visiting a family in a motel during lockdown and seeing “a lovely child, 6 years of age, sitting in the tree and all she had was being able to look out at the cars all day”.
“But as we drove into the motel up on the second storey there were the dealers, and they knew everything that came in and out . . . incredibly high risk for the children.”
In another case, a young woman found herself out of a job after having a baby, and was sent to a motel for emergency housing, Bergin says.
“She turned up with a very young baby on her hip, probably about 5 months old, and the motelier . . . said ‘are you fresh out of prison, because all my rooms have got prisoners’.”
The frightened woman rang the
find alternatives, where possible.
A flexible funding package specifically set up for wha¯nau with children in emergency housing started in November under the Homelessness Action Plan.
The fund could cover additional or increased costs for immediate needs due to staying in emergency housing, especially related to keeping kids in education, early childhood education, or to address wellbeing needs.
A Ka¯inga Ora homes and communities
trust. “We were just lucky to be able to accommodate her and her child but it is quite frightening.”
Bergin wonders if some families would be safer back in their cars, parked together at a council reserve. “Is that safer than actually being next to a room [of] sex offenders?”
She worries about what might come out in 20 or 30 years “because sexual abuse is not disclosed instantly, often, especially when it’s children”.
“So we have to hope that there are not going to be historic sex allegations come out when people reach their 25 and 30s from the motel.” This is a “very, very sensitive situation . . . something that needs to be changed”.
Emergency versus transitional housing
Even before the pandemic, the Government was trying to shift more resources from emergency to transitional housing, including committing money for more places. The latter is cheaper, provides wrap-around support, and means the Government can better monitor what’s happening. spokesman said the organisation’s larger developments typically included shared spaces.
This was to allow residents to connect with each other and encourage wellbeing, he said.
This could include multifunctional community rooms with kitchens and open-plan gathering spaces and common green spaces with children’s playgrounds.
Decisions around amenities also took into account existing nearby facilities, he said.
Ministers were told emergency housing means the Government “cannot regulate for quality standards”, it comes at a “higher cost per place which does not include support service costs” and “does not provide stability”.
A 2019 ministerial briefing also said officials would be trying to get families with children into longer-term housing as recognition “motel accommodation is more suitable for single clients or adults without children who do not have complex needs”.
National’s Willis says emergency housing was only ever supposed to be a short-term solution.
If you put someone with
high needs, with mental health needs or addiction and you “put them in a motel next to former criminals, gang members, and you say to them, ‘good luck’ and leave them there for months on end, you are not helping that family get proper housing”, she says.
“That is not a solution for anyone. It is not treating people with dignity, is not treating people with respect and it’s not solving the problem.”
Willis also asked a range of written parliamentary questions of Social Development Minister Carmel Sepuloni about how MSD monitors what’s going on in emergency motels.
Information about incidents family harm, criminal activity social disorder is “not centrally the minister replied.
Willis also asked how MSD monitors whether families are free from intimidation and harassment and that accommodation is safe and suitable — the response was emergency housing providers are expected to meet the relevant standards and when “concerns are raised”, MSD follows up with the provider on a “case-by-case basis”.
Bergin says a much better system would be one in which certain people are housed together, for example one motel for families only, one for single men and another for those who’ve just got out of prison.
Much better oversight is also needed, she says, like a specialist team that knows exactly where people are staying, their case details so they can then make decisions about the best place for them, and continue to monitor what’s going on.
Wellington City Missioner Murray Edridge says there are greater volumes of people going into emergency housing, reflecting the housing shortage, which is a “deeply complex and difficult issue to fix”.
Inadequate support is creating problems when there are “people put together into groups . . . who are struggling and in difficulty any way”.
“The reality is, people are in difficult situations,” he says, “and without the ability for people to help them change their life course, their direction of travel, then things aren’t going to get any better for them.”
Housing Minister Megan Woods told RNZ’S Morning Report the situation is “not acceptable”. She says the Government is aware of “the reality we are facing” in emergency housing.
She’s asked government agencies to work with iwi and those on the ground in Rotorua to find better options. “We’re looking at . . . moving away from . . . the two-track system.”
The Government was moving towards longer-term contracting for MSD accommodation, she said.
“We expect that we’ll be able to see some change in the coming weeks.”
Woods says the Government is looking to provide more support to those in emergency housing. — RNZ
It’s slowly killing our town, I’ve never
seen Rotorua so bad, so ugly, in all my life. Reg Hennessy y