Sunday News

Ghost miles: How did 49km go missing from Bluff to Cape Re¯ inga?

How do so many expert agencies come up with different distances between two of the most recognised and photograph­ed signposts in New Zealand? Craig Hoyle investigat­es.

-

Somewhere, somehow, 49 kilometres have gone missing in Aotearoa. Government agencies don’t know where they are. Neither do a range of local boards, experts and transport policy wonks.

But what we do know is this: at opposite ends of the motu, in Bluff and Cape Re¯ inga, two iconic road signs give very different numbers for how far it is from one end of the country to the other.

This mystery came to my attention a few weeks ago.

I’d been in Invercargi­ll for a week – I grew up in the deep south – and popped out to

Stirling Point in Bluff for old times’ sake. Many a childhood Saturday was spent around that sign, fish and chips in hand, as biting southerlie­s blew from Antarctica.

I snapped a pic of the sign: 1403km to Cape Re¯ inga.

The next weekend, having zipped the length of the country, I was in Cape Re¯ inga with a friend who was visiting from the UK. This was, I enthused, the perfect chance to get a matching set of pictures.

I lined up my shot beside the lighthouse, zoomed in, and… wait a minute: 1452km to Bluff.

Something clearly did not add up. ‘‘Might be time for an investigat­ion,’’ I wrote on Facebook.

A few weeks later I’m on the phone to Ray Fife, who chairs the Bluff Community Board.

He’s as confused as I am.

‘‘It’s strange that one sign says one thing, and the other says another. You’d think it’d be the same at each end!’’

Fife doesn’t know who’s responsibl­e for setting the distances on the signs, but has some helpful suggestion­s for who to call next.

My next stop is the NZ Transport Agency. ‘‘This is a bit of an odd one, but I’m wondering if Waka Kotahi is able to provide an official driving distance between Bluff and Cape Re¯ inga,’’ I email.

Media manager Megan Heffield comes back with a reply that is both helpful, and deepens the mystery.

‘‘The distance by road, according to Google Maps, is approximat­ely 2067km, including the ferry crossing. If you take out the ferry crossing, I get approx. 1975km.’’

Heffield adds that the road signs both appear to be referencin­g ‘‘the distance as the crow flies’’. This leads me down a rabbit hole about whether crows fly over open ocean, given the direct route from Bluff to Cape Re¯ inga runs hundreds of miles offshore from the west coast.

I then discover there are no crows in Aotearoa, and the ocean-flying question becomes moot. So just how far is it from Bluff to

Cape Re¯ inga, as the albatross flies?

It’s time to call on Toitā Te Whenua, Land Informatio­n New Zealand (LINZ), which records Aotearoa’s physical features ‘‘to provide up-to-date maps and informatio­n’’.

Here at last, we have answers. ‘‘The point-to-point distance between the signposts at Bluff and Cape Re¯ inga is 1401km,’’ says LINZ communicat­ions manager Steve Janes.

‘‘Note that this does not include variables from things like the road network, topography etc.’’

So there we have it: the Bluff sign, saying 1403km, is much closer to being correct.

Janes adds there are several ways to calculate distances, ‘‘and different methods will give slightly different results’’ – which may be why the Bluff sign

is 2km off.

‘‘For the figure above, we have calculated the distance using the ellipsoida­l model of the Earth, which is used for the New Zealand Geodetic Datum 2000 (the country’s official datum).’’ The only thing left to find out is why the Cape Re¯ inga sign is so… well, wrong.

The trail leads from Far North District Council to local iwi, who

recently oversaw an upgrade of facilities at Cape Re¯ inga – although apparently they’re not responsibl­e for the iconic sign.

The Department of Conservati­on (DOC) is my final stop. Here, finally, are answers from senior ranger Laree Furniss.

‘‘We are aware of the discrepanc­y and will be looking to change the distance on the Cape Re¯ inga sign when the sign is next due for upgrading/ replacemen­t.’’

So does DOC have a timeline for upgrading the sign?

‘‘No sorry, it’s not in the immediate plans though.’’ Mystery solved.

I let Ray Fife know that the Bluff sign, while still a couple of kilometres off, is much closer to being correct.

‘‘Great news. Thanks Craig.’’ Meanwhile the Cape Re¯ inga sign will likely be wrong for a few more years yet, meaning any albatross making the journey may unexpected­ly have half an hour spare.

 ?? ??
 ?? ??
 ?? ??
 ?? CRAIG HOYLE, JOHN HAWKINS, BROOK SABIN / STUFF ?? Bluff Community Board chair Ray Fife, above, is as confused as everyone else at the discrepanc­y between the distances on the Stirling Point, inset left, and Cape Re¯ inga, above, signs.
CRAIG HOYLE, JOHN HAWKINS, BROOK SABIN / STUFF Bluff Community Board chair Ray Fife, above, is as confused as everyone else at the discrepanc­y between the distances on the Stirling Point, inset left, and Cape Re¯ inga, above, signs.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand