Sunday Star-Times

Time to live up to our own ideals

- Tracy Watkins tracy.watkins@stuff.co.nz

Tomorrow kicks off the start of Te Wiki o te Reo Ma¯ori (Ma¯ori language week) so we decided to start the celebratio­ns early here by changing up our masthead. Te Tautiaki is not a literal translatio­n of the words Sunday Star-Times but rather a statement of what we strive for. Te Tautiaki is the guard – it means to stand guard and protect. In the context of the newspaper, it’s our job to guard and protect against the abuse of power. Sometimes that includes turning the spotlight on ourselves.

As journalist­s, we are often referred to as powerful, and it’s true; we are privileged with a voice that amplifies the issues on which we take a stand. That voice has stood for much that is good – it has brought about positive change, shone a light on wrongdoing, and righted injustices.

In my time at Te Tautiaki, the Sunday StarTimes, we have carried powerful stories, including our Stuff Circuit team exposing

New Zealand’s deadly failures in Afghanista­n; Tony Wall’s Drugging the Elderly series, which raised important issues about the way we care for our frailest citizens; and the ongoing exposure of sexual abuse and harassment in sport, business, and academia thanks to the work of top journalist­s, including the amazing Alison Mau.

But no person, or organisati­on, is without flaws. And on issues of race we have not always lived up to our own ideals.

There’s an old saying in news that ‘‘if it bleeds, it leads’’. In much the same way, I can recall as a young journalist many decades ago the news desk had more appetite for negative coverage of Ma¯ori, than for positive stories. But this editorial is my personal mea culpa – I can’t speak for the industry – so it’s only right for me to acknowledg­e that I’m in no position to point fingers. As a young reporter, hungry to get my name on page one, I was just as complicit.

But our other failing was the lack of diversity in our newsrooms. With Ma¯ori so poorly represente­d in the industry, it’s no wonder we were hopeless at telling stories of importance to that community.

Back when I started out in journalism I worked with or knew some exceptiona­l Ma¯ori journalist­s – the late Richard Knight, Chris Wikaira, Jon Stokes and Reuben Wharawhara, to name just a few. But they were, in every sense of the word, a minority, as highlighte­d by Stuff national correspond­ent Carmen Parahi, who writes in today’s Star-Times about the hard slog of being a Ma¯ori journalist.

Hopefully the drive for greater diversity in today’s newsrooms will lessen that sense of isolation over time because we have got a lot better at acknowledg­ing our flaws and understand­ing why we need to change. Parahi’s role at Stuff, for instance, includes oversight of the dedicated pou tiaka site and there has been a conscious effort to create projects that uplift the voices of Ma¯ori – such as the Aotearoa in 20 project in today’s StarTimes.

This can’t and won’t mend the hurt of our past mistakes. But I hope it means we are finally doing a better job of covering the stories that matter to the communitie­s we purport to represent.

And in the meantime, it’s good to know we have journalist­s like Parahi who are brave enough to call us out when we need it.

We have got a lot better at acknowledg­ing our flaws and understand­ing why we need to change.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand