Sunday Star-Times

Biden pulls US punches over killing

-

The newly declassifi­ed US intelligen­ce report that says Saudi Arabia’s crown prince likely approved the killing of US-based journalist Jamal Khashoggi inside the Saudi consulate in Istanbul has ratcheted up the pressure on the Biden Administra­tion to hold the kingdom accountabl­e for a murder that drew worldwide outrage.

The public rebuke of Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman is a touchstone in US-Saudi relations. Americans will forever associate him with the brutal killing of a journalist who promoted democracy and human rights.

Yet even as the Biden Administra­tion released the findings yesterday, it appeared determined to preserve the Saudi relationsh­ip by avoiding direct punishment of the prince himself – despite demands from some Democrats in Congress and Khashoggi allies for sanctions.

US Secretary of State Antony Blinken defended the approach.

‘‘What we’ve done by the actions we’ve taken is not to rupture the relationsh­ip but to recalibrat­e it to be more in line with our interests and our values,’’ he said. ‘‘I think that we have to understand as well that this is bigger than any one person.’’

The conclusion that the prince approved an operation to kill or capture Khashoggi was based on his decision-making role inside the kingdom, the involvemen­t of a key adviser and members of his protective detail, and his past support for violently silencing dissidents abroad, according to the report from the Office of the Director of National Intelligen­ce.

Though intelligen­ce officials stopped short of saying the prince ordered the October 2018 murder, the four-page document described him as having ‘‘absolute control’’ over the kingdom’s intelligen­ce organisati­ons, and said it would have been highly unlikely for an operation like the killing to have been carried out without his approval.

Saudi Arabia’s Foreign Ministry responded by saying the kingdom ‘‘categorica­lly rejects the offensive and incorrect assessment in the report pertaining to the kingdom’s leadership’’.

Shortly after the findings were released, the US State Department announced a new policy, called the ‘‘Khashoggi Ban’’, that will allow the US to deny visas to people who harm, threaten or spy on journalist­s on behalf of a foreign government.

It also said it would impose visa restrictio­ns on 76 Saudi individual­s who have engaged or threatened dissidents overseas.

The State Department declined to comment on who would be affected, but a person familiar with the matter, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said the prince was not targeted.

Rights activists said the lack of any punitive measures would signal impunity for the prince and other autocrats.

Without sanctions, ‘‘it’s a joke’’, said Tawwakol Karman, a Nobel Peace Price winner from neighbouri­ng Yemen and a friend of Khashoggi’s.

Though the Biden Administra­tion’s relationsh­ip with Saudi Arabia is likely to be more adversaria­l than that of Donald Trump’s, the reality is that Riyadh’s oil reserves and status as a counterbal­ance to Iran in the Middle East have long made it a strategic – if difficult – ally.

The prince, an ambitious 35-year-old who has rapidly consolidat­ed power since his father became king in 2015, said in 2019 that he took ‘‘full responsibi­lity’’ for the killing since it happened on his watch, but denied ordering it.

Saudi officials have said Khashoggi’s killing was the work of rogue Saudi security and intelligen­ce officials. Saudi Arabian courts last year sentenced eight Saudi nationals to prison for the killing.

 ?? AP, GETTY IMAGES ?? Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, left, has been given a rare rebuke by the United States over the murder of journalist Jamal Khashoggi, right – but he has avoided any direct punishment, such as sanctions.
AP, GETTY IMAGES Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, left, has been given a rare rebuke by the United States over the murder of journalist Jamal Khashoggi, right – but he has avoided any direct punishment, such as sanctions.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand