Combat drills part of election officials’ training for 2024 vote
“We recognise the real and present danger that’s presented by the conspiracy theories and the lies ... An ounce of prevention is really all we can afford right now.” Arizona Secretary of State Adrian Fontes
In training poll workers for this year’s United States presidential election, Arizona Secretary of State Adrian Fontes is preparing them for a series of worstcase scenarios, including combat. His office is coordinating active shooter drills for election workers, and has sent kits to county election offices that include tourniquets to stem bleeding, devices to barricade doors, and hammers to break glass windows.
Fontes, a Democrat and US Marine Corps veteran, doesn’t think he is overreacting.
“We recognise the real and present danger that’s presented by the conspiracy theories and the lies,” he said. “An ounce of prevention is really all we can afford right now, and so that’s what we’re going to do.”
Across the nation, those who run voting operations say they are preparing for the types of disruptions that historically had been more associated with political unrest abroad than American elections.
In a year when Republicans appear on track to nominate for president Donald Trump, who continues to deny the results of the last election and is already casting doubt on the integrity of this one, election officials are going on offence more than ever to try to keep election workers safe, educate voters on how the voting and counting processes work, debunk misinformation, and hold accountable those who try to disrupt the democratic process.
They are amping up advertising budgets, increasing training for election workers, learning how best to quickly correct false information, and bolstering coordination with federal, state and local law enforcement to better respond to threats and harassment.
The scale of the undertaking reflects the magnitude of the challenge.
After years of Trump’s relentless attacks on the election system, fewer than a third of Republicans see President Joe Biden’s 2020 victory as legitimate. Many voters who believe that the vote was rigged cite as evidence a series of claims that have been repeatedly debunked. New conspiracy theories sprout almost daily, some tracing their origins to authentic-looking AI-generated videos.
All the while, election workers face harassment and threats.
Officials say they are realistic about how much they can do to counter those trends.
“We are never going to get the true believers or the people who are running the grift,” said Matt Crane, a former elections officer who is now executive director of the Colorado County Clerks Association, which advocates for local election officials. “Jesus Christ could come and say, ‘No, you’re wrong’. And these people would tell Jesus, ‘You’re crazy’.”
A Trump campaign spokesperson responded to this high level of preparation by saying in a statement: “Election integrity is one of the bedrocks of democracy, and there’s nobody who is a bigger defender of free and fair elections than President Trump.”
Election officials had similar fears in the days leading up to the 2022 midterm elections, after Trump and his supporters had spent two years threatening to flood polls and counting stations with partisan watchers, and otherwise suggesting they might not accept the results. In the end, the election largely went off without a hitch – even a personal call from Trump for protesters to show up in Detroit on Election Day had no effect – offering some hope about the resilience of American democracy.
Still, election officials say they are taking no chances this year, particularly with Trump on track to be back on the ballot. They say they are willing to try almost anything to counter the mounting efforts to undermine trust in America’s elections.
In Colorado, the executive board of the county clerks association sent a letter to elected officials across the state begging them to vouch for the integrity of elections, and to stand against “dishonest actors, grifters, and bullies, who deserve only our disdain and contempt”. The December letter provided talking points for officials to share when asked about the voting process.
In Michigan, local election workers have been trained on how to de-escalate situations, and state officials are setting up a texting programme so workers can quickly contact their bosses and law enforcement if they are in danger – an idea already implemented in Georgia.
In Nevada, Secretary of State Cisco Aguilar is regularly meeting with pastors and neighbourhood groups to build trust in the election process. The office was prepared for inaccurate information to spread in English and Spanish months before the 2024 cycle was upon it.
When false claims began taking hold that Trump would not appear on Nevada’s February presidential primary ballot because his team forgot to file the necessary paperwork, Aguilar’s office reiterated to voters in both languages that Trump and other GOP candidates had instead chosen to participate in a GOP-sanctioned caucus.
The office has also hired three new investigators to probe allegations of voter fraud, threats against election workers, and other election-related claims.
Nowhere is the aggressive posture more obvious than in political battleground states that decided the last presidential election and endured attempts to overturn the results.
Many workers who were on the front lines of running the 2020 and 2022 elections left their jobs because of the hostile environment. Those who remain are taking a more proactive approach this year in hopes of a more peaceful process.
This is especially true in Arizona. When Trump and his supporters tried to reverse Biden’s 2020 victory, Arizona was one of their top targets. Officials weathered death threats and harassment as they defended the election process and the results it yielded.
In 2020, Fontes was a top election official in Maricopa, the state’s most populous county. There, Trump supporters surrounded one of his colleagues outside a building where ballots were being processed. The colleague had to be yanked from the angry crowd by a sheriff’s deputy.
Fontes and others are finding ways to blunt the harassment some election workers face.
These include possibly registering employees’ home addresses with law enforcement in case they are targeted by prank calls to emergency services designed to draw a police response, a harassment tactic known as swatting. And as part of an effort to quickly counter disinformation and misinformation, Fontes is teaching officials and the public how to spot fake videos and photos generated by artificial intelligence.
In addition to those statewide efforts, local leaders are making their own plans.
In the days around the election, the Phoenix-area sheriff’s office will intensify surveillance of the county’s ballot tabulation headquarters by horseback, drones and other methods.
In Cochise County, a conservative rural area in southern Arizona, officials were planning to train election workers how to recognise exposure to fentanyl, and how to administer the overdose reversal drug Narcan, said Sheriff Mark Dannels. Late last year, election offices across the nation received letters containing white powdery substances - some initially thought to be fentanyl.
“We have never done that before,” Dannels said. “It’s a sad state.”
Across Arizona, officials said protecting the integrity of the election and the safety of poll workers started with better educating voters and countering false information.
In Maricopa, home to Phoenix and most of the state’s voters, county officials have given more than 200 tours of the ballot-counting facility, taking people stepby-step through the counting process. The county attorney’s office has added another lawyer to help handle election-related work, including responding to efforts to try to obstruct voting.
The county’s GOP-led governing board planned to operate an emergency communications centre, modelled after systems used to respond during natural disasters, so it could quickly and efficiently manage the flow of information, a top official familiar with the plans said.
In 2020, county leaders assigned two employees to handle election-related inquiries from the public. This year, seven employees are dedicated to those inquiries, and county leaders are working on plans to assign as many as 26 additional staff to the centre.
The county tested an emergency communications centre during the 2022 midterm election. Those assigned to the centre set expectations for the public about the length of time it would take to count ballots, as well as debunking volumes of deceptive information in both English and Spanish.
This year, the county was testing technology that would embed digital information in online video and photos, allowing the public to distinguish between official government information and deepfakes, a person familiar with the planning said.
Pinal County, a conservative area that borders metro Phoenix, was overwhelmed during the midterm election by requests for recorded video of ballot drop boxes, the steel boxes that were central to the false storyline that “mules” had illegally stuffed them with fraudulent ballots to help Biden.
This time, Pinal officials are boosting internet capacity to stream live footage of the boxes online, hoping this will discourage armed citizens from showing up to monitor them.
The county is also preparing to expand the use of GPS devices to track the movements of batches of ballots and voting equipment. The tracking system, first tested during the midterms, was developed in response to false claims that emerged in 2020 about voting security, including one involving a rumour that a school bus filled with voting equipment had been abandoned in a desert town. (The bus was carrying office equipment, and had not been abandoned.)
Officials are also working to step up punishments for those who seek to undermine elections.
Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes obtained felony indictments late last year against two GOP supervisors in Cochise County who delayed their governing board’s acceptance of midterm election results. The supervisors have pleaded not guilty, and have cast the case as politically motivated.
Mayes is also investigating Republican electors who falsely portrayed Trump as the state’s winner in 2020. That probe could soon net long-expected indictments, a person familiar with the status of the investigation said.
Mayes has retooled a unit once exclusively devoted to probing claims of election fraud – some false – to instead focus on threats against election workers, voting rights and ballot access.
She told The Post that her office “will not tolerate any efforts to undermine our democracy”.