Taranaki Daily News

A monumental truth

Monuments that mark moments in a nation’s history have come under fire around the world recently. Deena Coster investigat­es the legacy of land war memorials in Taranaki.

-

When Wharehoka Wano looks around his rohe, he only ever sees one side of the story. For 20 years, Taranaki was in the grip of civil war as colonial forces sought to take control and Ma¯ori battled back, trying to protect their land and way of life.

But the memorials which sprang up around the province in the decades following the land wars primarily tell European stories of courage and loss.

‘‘They’re not accurate, they acknowledg­e a side, a version of those that were involved,’’ Wano says.

An example of this chasm of experience is the treatment given to one of the most important places in New Zealand’s military history – Te Kohia pa¯ site near Waitara – where on March 17, 1860, the first shots were fired in the land war conflict.

‘‘You drive past Brixton and it’s acknowledg­ed in no way,’’ the Taranaki Iwi chief executive says.

‘‘There’s a part of history which is basically invisible.’’

New Zealand’s civil war, fought between 1860-1881, left hundreds of Ma¯ori and European dead but few battle sites have been preserved and only a select group have been memorialis­ed while the rest go forgotten, lying in unmarked graves.

Along with the death toll, the conflict left deep social, cultural and pyschologi­cal wounds that have only recently begun to heal. Taranaki Ma¯ori had to wait until 2001 to receive their public apology from the Crown, by way of a treaty deal for Nga¯ti Ruanui, the first iwi in the region to settle its longstandi­ng grievances.

And it was only this year the Government said sorry for the atrocities suffered by the people of Parihaka, after the village was ransacked and its women raped during the November 1881 invasion.

Archaeolog­ist Ivan Bruce says the land war monuments in Taranaki ‘‘are in many cases the only memorial to men whose remains were never found, or to our shame, now lie in the many unmarked or lost military graveyards’’.

‘‘We hold a social contract with our soldiery. Their dead are to be recognised, regardless of whether we necessaril­y agree with the causes of the conflict to which we send them. To be remembered is their unalienabl­e right,’’ Bruce says.

But he argues this has to be balanced against a need to fully understand the history connected to the land wars, from both the Ma¯ori and European perspectiv­e.

‘‘As part of our national identity, it’s inescapabl­e,’’ Bruce says.

While the Treaty of Waitangi settlement­s for iwi are one plank for redressing the damage wrought upon Ma¯ori in the aftermath of war, Bruce says community organisati­ons, councils and schools all have a role to

‘‘That doesn’t mean we have to knock down the ones that were there before.’’ Professor Michael Belgrave, of Massey University, says memorials can be useful to critique the country’s past.

‘‘You’ve got to have these conversati­ons about them.’’

New Plymouth archaeolog­ist Ivan Bruce wants the history behind the land war monuments to be better understood.

‘‘There’s honesty and power and forgivenes­s in telling those stories.’’

Taranaki Iwi chief executive Wharehoka Wano says more effort needs to be made to tell the region’s history accurately.

‘‘I’m an artist and I’m here to represent history as I see it.’’ Taranaki sculptor Fridtjof Hanson, the man who created the Lieutenant Colonel William Malone statue in Stratford.

play in becoming better informed about the province’s past.

‘‘Monuments are never just a tribute to an event, persons or period in history but they represent the collective values of those who erect the monument at the time it was erected. As our values change the way we view these monuments also shifts.’’ In the United States, the removal of statues and monuments dedicated to Confederat­e soldiers has sparked fierce controvers­y recently.

Civil rights activists believe the statues serve as constant reminders of slavery, and more than 60 have been removed or renamed since 2015. This has resulted in a series of confrontat­ions between activists and the far right. In August, Heather Heyer, 32, was killed in Charlottes­ville, Virginia while attending a counter-rally against white supremacis­ts.

Last month, Captain James Cook’s statue in Sydney came under the spotlight after Aboriginal leaders asked for the 138-year-old monument to be modified. The statue was criticised for making the indigenous people invisible and calls were made to change the inscriptio­n to reflect that Aborigines had been in Australia 60,000 years before Cook arrived.

New Zealand’s monuments have not escaped such attentions. Statues of Captain James Cook, including one on Gisborne’s Kaiti Hill, were repeatedly defaced by vandals last year, who streaked red paint across the head and crotch areas.

This month, a petition to have the Nixon memorial moved from

ta¯huhu to the Auckland Museum was launched.

Colonel Marmaduke George Nixon was an early settler to South Auckland and took part in the settler invasion of the Waikato in the 1860s. He died on May 27, 1864 from wounds he suffered in battle. Criticism about the memorial includes that it pays tribute to soldiers who died but makes no mention of Ma¯ori who perished.

Petition organiser Shane Te Pou says the Nixon memorial is an example of a ‘‘Eurocentri­c’’ view of history.

Professor Michael Belgrave, of Massey University, says monuments and memorials can be a useful medium to confront and critique a nation’s history.

Some memorials around the world are divisive, racist and historical­ly incorrect, he says.

In light of this, Belgrave says it’s important that when a better understand­ing of history is reached, these learnings should then be reflected in the landscape which surrounds us as well.

This could involve incorporat­ing new informatio­n onto existing memorials.

‘‘It doesn’t mean we have to knock down the ones that were there before,’’ Belgrave says.

Fridtjof Hanson’s hands have helped sculpt statues which are on public display in Taranaki, including a bronze replica of Lieutenant Colonel William Malone, which sits along Stratford’s Broadway.

Malone was commemorat­ed for his heroic actions during World War I, at Gallipoli and Chunuk Bair and was regaled for his qualities as a leader.

At the time the statue was signed off by the Stratford District Council in 2010, there was mention made of how some Ma¯ori might object to putting up a statue of a man who took part in the invasion at Parihaka.

Trying to capture the full essence of his subject, is something Hanson grapples with for hours in his Cowling Rd studio, as he moulds wet clay into a human form.

Sculpting might be a hobby he took on after his retirement as a surgeon, but it’s not a subject he takes lightly.

‘‘I’m an artist and I’m here to represent history as I see it.’’

He says war is ‘‘a problem which has afflicted the human race from the very beginning’’ but the people who want to destroy, deface or vandalise statues are ‘‘misguided’’.

Hanson says by focusing on this aspect of conflict, the real lesson of war – how to avoid it in the first place – gets lost along the way.

Wano says of people publicly honoured in Taranaki, there will always be a Ma¯ori viewpoint on the role they played either on the battlefiel­d or regarding the confiscati­on and selling off of land.

‘‘There’s certainly a part of me that’s saddened and sometimes gets angry,’’ he says, admitting he struggles with seeing some people put up on a pedestal while others are left out in the cold.

The main point Wano wants to make about history is that the right informatio­n should be told. He is seeing a greater will within the education system to ensure the teachings are correct. This includes the launch of Te Takanga o te Wa¯, which is a new framework for teaching Ma¯ori history to Year 1-8 students.

‘‘There’s been a real push for New Zealand history to be told accurately,’’ he says. ‘‘That’s really important to us tribally.’’

The Government’s willingnes­s to acknowledg­e the conflict also moved forward this year when a date for the inaugural commemorat­ion to mark the land wars was set for October 28.

As part of reconcilia­tion and moving into the post-settlement space, iwi are also beginning to ‘‘take control’’ of their own truths to ensure they are being heard, Wano says. ‘‘There’s honesty and power and forgivenes­s in telling those stories.’’

 ?? PHOTO: ROBERT CHARLES/STUFF ?? How we remember our past can determine our present. The European soldier on New Plymouth’s Marsland Hill land wars memorial was smashed off in 1991. It has never been replaced.
PHOTO: ROBERT CHARLES/STUFF How we remember our past can determine our present. The European soldier on New Plymouth’s Marsland Hill land wars memorial was smashed off in 1991. It has never been replaced.
 ?? PHOTO: CHARLOTTE CURD/STUFF ?? Te Kohia Pa site on Devon Rd near Waitara, may be the next site for a memorial to the Taranaki land wars.
PHOTO: CHARLOTTE CURD/STUFF Te Kohia Pa site on Devon Rd near Waitara, may be the next site for a memorial to the Taranaki land wars.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand