The Post

Work visa cancelled without proof: ERA

- ANUJA NADKARNI

A chef whose work visa was cancelled by Immigratio­n New Zealand amid claims he manipulate­d a medical test has been awarded $33,000.

Babu Pandit worked at Satya Mount Eden in Auckland and was on extended leave in his home country when his employment and visa suddenly ended.

Pandit was told his boss, Akuthota Jwala Narsimha Swamy, had informed Immigratio­n New Zealand he had manipulate­d a health test in order to get a his visa renewed.

But the Employment Relations Authority (ERA) found there was no evidence of this and Pandit was never given an opportunit­y to respond to the allegation­s.

Pandit said he had moved to New Zealand seeking better employment opportunit­ies to save for the education of his son, but the sudden dismissal shocked him and shattered his plans.

Pandit was interviewe­d for the role in India and was employed under the terms of three work visas issued between 2013 and 2016.

During the visa renewal process, Pandit had to undergo a medical assessment that measured his blood sugar levels over three months.

Pandit sought his GP’s advice for controllin­g his blood sugar levels after the first test showed his levels were elevated. His GP suggested diet and lifestyle changes.

When the test was repeated, the doctor said Pandit’s condition had improved thanks to diet and lifestyle modificati­on and granted his work visa.

During his leave, Swamy alleged Pandit took medication that altered the results of the medical examinatio­n. He wrote to Immigratio­n NZ asking for ‘‘further action’’ because Pandit’s employment would be terminated.

Swamy said he acted fast because he did not want to compromise the status of his business in having visa applicatio­ns approved.

But the ERA said this was not a satisfacto­ry explanatio­n for what he did.

The authority said Swamy acted unfairly as an employer because he made no direct inquiry about his allegation­s to Pandit and acted on a secondhand account without checking or advising Immigratio­n NZ to confirm if there was any truth to the claim.

‘‘A fair and reasonable employer could not have acted on that supposed informatio­n without providing an opportunit­y to comment and possibly correct it,’’ the decision said.

The authority said how Immigratio­n NZ officers dealt with the issue also contribute­d to Pandit’s unfair dismissal.

‘‘More might reasonably be expected of INZ to verify the allegation Swamy made rather than automatica­lly acting on it to cancel a worker’s visa.’’

Pandit has been awarded $18,465 in lost remunerati­on and $15,000 as compensati­on for hurt and humiliatio­n.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand