Hague: Act now to stop chemical warfare
CHINA/VANUATU: China has approached Vanuatu about building a permanent military presence in the South Pacific, in a globally significant move that could see the rising superpower’s warships operating on Australia’s doorstep.
Fairfax Media can reveal that there have been preliminary discussions between the Chinese and Vanuatu governments about a military buildup in the island nation.
While no formal proposals have been put to Vanuatu’s government, senior Australian security officials believe Beijing’s plans could culminate in a full military base. The prospect of a Chinese military outpost so close to Australia has been discussed at the highest levels in Canberra and Washington.
A base less than 2000km from the Australian coast would allow China to project military power into the Pacific Ocean and upend the long-standing strategic balance in the region, potentially increasing the risk of confrontation between China and the United States.
It would be the first overseas base China has established in the Pacific, and only its second in the world.
Australian intelligence and security figures, along with their partners in the US and New Zealand, have been watching with concern as Beijing deepens its influence with Pacific Island governments through infrastructure building and loans.
Beijing has been showering Vanuatu, which has a population of about 270,000, with hundreds of millions of dollars in development money, and last week committed to building a new official residence for Prime Minister Charlot Salwai, as well as other government buildings.
Multiple sources said Beijing’s military ambition in Vanuatu would likely be realised incrementally, possibly beginning with an access agreement that would allow Chinese naval ships to dock routinely and be serviced, refuelled and restocked. This arrangement could then be built on.
One of the most substantial projects funded by Chinese money is a major new wharf on the northern island of Espiritu Santo. Jonathan Pryke, a Pacific Islands expert with the Lowy Institute, said the Luganville wharf had ‘‘raised eyebrows in defence, intelligence and diplomatic circles’’ in Canberra because while its stated purpose was to host cruise ships, it had the potential to service naval vessels as well.
The wharf is close to an international airport that China is helping Vanuatu upgrade.
Fairfax Media understands that there are senior figures within China’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) who would like to move quickly to establish a proper base on Vanuatu.
Vanuatu’s High Commissioner in Canberra, Kalfau Kaloris, said his country’s foreign ministry was ‘‘not aware of any such proposal’’.
A spokeswoman for the Chinese embassy in Canberra declined to comment.
China has already projected its military strength into the sea by building military capacity on a number of reclaimed reefs in the South China Sea, prompting condemnation from the international community, including Australia. Vanuatu is one of the few countries that steadfastly support Beijing’s controversial islandbuilding programme.
Comparisons have been made in Canberra and Washington to methods China has used in the Indian Ocean, where it has recently established its first overseas military base in the African nation of Djibouti and is reportedly considering military facilities in Pakistan and Sri Lanka. The Djibouti base features a port, helicopter base, hangars and accommodation for up to 10,000 troops.
Tonga has also been mentioned as a possible site for a Chinese base, though recent discussion has centred around the intense efforts China has been putting into Vanuatu.
Australian Foreign Minister Julie Bishop visited Vanuatu with Prince Charles on Saturday on a diplomatic tour that Fairfax Media has been told was aimed at demonstrating the merits of the Commonwealth’s commitment to a free and open system of international rules.
Defence experts said a military base on Vanuatu, which would likely be followed by bases elsewhere, would allow the PLA to challenge the US’s post-war dominance of the Pacific, which is strongly supported by Australia and has been seen as a cornerstone of Australia’s security.
‘‘If it turns out there are one or more Chinese bases . . . what it has the ability to do is challenge, and make much more challenging, American access into the region,’’ said Charles Edel, a former adviser to former US secretary of state John Kerry.
‘‘Chinese presence in Vanuatu, while today about fishing access and commercial trade, tomorrow could represent a threat to Australia’s northern approaches,’’ he said.
Edel, who is now at the US Studies Centre, said this would change Australia’s external security environment in a way not seen ‘‘probably since the 1940s’’.
Such a Chinese presence would make the seas ‘‘more crowded’’ for the Royal Australian Navy, though professional forces could manage this safely, and it would not stop Australian or US forces operating where they needed to, he said.
Edel added that access to plentiful fisheries to feed China’s fastrising demand for protein could be one reason for it consolidating its influence in the South Pacific.
Zack Cooper, a former White House and Pentagon official now at the Washington-based Centre for Strategic and International Studies, said he had expected China to establish bases in the Pacific, and predicted more to follow.
Cooper said that with the US focused on north Asia, Washington would expect Australia to stop the South Pacific from sliding too deeply into Beijing’s hands. ‘‘I think it is important that Australia appreciate that China is far away but Chinese activity is definitely affecting Australia.’’ – Fairfax BRITAIN: Chemical weapons will become ‘‘legitimised’’ and used in future wars if the West fails to take military action against the regime of Syrian President Bashar alAssad, former British foreign secretary William Hague says.
Writing in The Daily Telegraph, Hague said he was in ‘‘little doubt’’ that if he were still in office today, he would recommend military intervention in Syria.
Prime Minister Theresa May has suggested that Britain is prepared to join any action by the United States and France, warning that the Syrian government ‘‘must be held to account’’ for the ‘‘barbaric’’ chemical attack on eastern Ghouta on Sunday.
The Telegraph understands that Cabinet ministers are urging May to avoid the potential ‘‘fiasco’’ of a House of Commons defeat on military action, such as that suffered by David Cameron in 2013, and instead take direct measures. May has also been warned that failure to join a coalition between the US and France could diminish Britain’s international standing.
US President Donald Trump said yesterday he would make a decision on the American response to the chemical weapons attacks within the ‘‘next 24 to 48 hours’’. Trump spoke with French President Emmanuel Macron on Monday and pledged a ‘‘strong, joint response’’.
Government sources said potential British action could involve cruise missiles or sorties by Tornado jets.
Hague was foreign secretary when the government lost its vote for action in Syria, which is widely considered to have emboldened the Assad regime. He said the UK became ‘‘enfeebled spectators of one of the most destructive conflagrations of our time’’.
– Telegraph Group