The Post

The future of working from home

- Susan Hornsby-Geluk

Over the past few months, New Zealanders have had a crash course in flexible working arrangemen­ts. This has meant significan­t changes to where, when and how we work.

While many employers were initially concerned about whether employees would be as productive working from home, the general consensus is that this compulsory experiment has been a surprising success.

Many employees have enjoyed working from home so much they have expressed reluctance about returning to the office. Others are understand­ably anxious about returning to the workplace and would prefer to continue working from home on an ongoing basis.

Will New Zealand now use this as an opportunit­y to move away from traditiona­l working arrangemen­ts, and towards a model that allows greater flexibilit­y and tailoring for individual circumstan­ces.

Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern has recently endorsed alternativ­e ways of working, encouragin­g employers to consider a four-day working week.

Despite this, there is a natural inclinatio­n for employers to want to see their employees at work and know what they are doing. Not all employers will be enthusiast­ic about their employees’ requests to work from home or change their hours of work.

So, what, if any, rights do employees have in this situation? The Employment Relations Act provides a mechanism for employees to request permanent or temporary changes to their working arrangemen­ts. Such requests may be for changes to the number of hours of work, the days of work, start and finish times, and where the work is performed.

Where an employee wants to make a formal request, they must do so in writing and must specify the proposed changes, the date upon which those changes would commence and the period of time the employee is seeking to work those alternativ­e arrangemen­ts.

When an employer receives a formal request, they are required to notify the employee in writing of their decision, as soon as possible, and no later than one month after receiving it. If the request is declined the employer must set out the reasons for this.

There are specified grounds for refusal in law which include the inability to reorganise work among existing staff, detrimenta­l impact on quality or performanc­e, insufficie­ncy of work during the periods that the employee wants to work, the burden of additional cost and the detrimenta­l effect on ability to meet customer demand.

While the employer is required to consider and respond to requests for flexible working arrangemen­ts, as long as they do this, an employee cannot challenge their employer’s refusal to agree to a request. In other words as long as the employer follows the procedural requiremen­ts the Employment Relations Authority will not scrutinise their decision making.

However, putting to one side the legal rights and obligation­s, one would expect that in the post-lockdown world there will be a greater willingnes­s to embrace flexible working arrangemen­ts. This is likely to become an expectatio­n on the part of employees and a factor in their thinking about whether to accept particular employment opportunit­ies.

For employers it should also be seen as a benefit that can be offered to attract and retain good staff.

This will create other issues that will need to be properly managed, including health and safety obligation­s. In this regard if working from home becomes a permanent arrangemen­t, employers will be bound under the Health and Safety at Work Act to ensure that the ‘‘home office’’ is a safe one.

Considerat­ion will also need to be given to whether the employer will contribute to additional costs incurred by the employee as a result of working from home, including heating and internet.

During the lockdown, employees who were working from home appeared to be willing to go the extra mile to make the best of the situation. This is likely to have been driven by a range of motivation­s including loyalty to their employer and an awareness that everyone had to pull together to keep the waka afloat in very difficult business conditions.

Coming out of lockdown, the willingnes­s of employers to accommodat­e flexible working arrangemen­ts on an ongoing basis will depend on employees continuing to demonstrat­e this same commitment and on showing the arrangemen­t is genuinely a ‘‘win-win’’.

Susan Hornsby-Geluk is a partner at Dundas Street Employment Lawyers.

 ??  ?? Employers and employees have had to adapt quickly and embrace new ways of working.
Employers and employees have had to adapt quickly and embrace new ways of working.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand