The Post

Middle-aged workers quitting now a mystery

- Janine Starks Janine Starks is a financial commentato­r and author of moneytips.nz with expertise in banking, personal finance and funds management. Opinions are a personal view and general in nature. They are not a recommenda­tion for any individual to buy

Have you heard of the ‘‘silver exodus’’? When I figured out what it was, I was slightly offended. If you’re over the age of 50 and not employed, you are part of this financial phenomenon. It has even been referred to as a ‘‘permacrisi­s in the workforce’’.

The last time I had a perm I was 15 and wanted to look like Kylie, but this time the phrase wasn’t a pop at ageing hairstyles.

Permacrisi­s (a permanent crisis) is the 2022 Collins Dictionary word of the year. My silver-haired age group has now caused permanent damage to the workforce with their unexplaine­d exits.

I’m trying to think of a better name, but the bottle-blonde-bolt hits a nerve too.

Jokes aside, the stats are coming out of the UK and my gut reaction is it’s no different in New Zealand. Anecdotall­y, more over-50s seem to have thrown in the towel at work.

This isn’t the same as the pandemic-led ‘‘Great Resignatio­n’’ or the ‘‘Big Quit’’. These workforce changes appear to be reversing after people used lockdown periods to rethink the type of jobs and flexibilit­y they want.

Stubbornly, the 50-to-65-year-old age group have dug in and stomped off permanentl­y. The British numbers show 27.6% of this demographi­c are economical­ly inactive. They’re even accused of exaggerati­ng inflation by driving up staff shortages.

The Office of National Statistics found a dominant trend of people simply giving up, alongside the usual health and stress reasons you’d expect to find. Examples included ‘‘wanted a lifestyle change’’, ‘‘did not want to work anymore’’ and ‘‘to retire from paid work’’.

From a financial perspectiv­e, we’d conclude these workers are wealthy and have created enough retirement income to go early. But the startling statistic is yet to come. It wasn’t a trend driven by high earners. It’s the low-middle earners leading the way.

Of course, the low-middle could be living with higher-earning spouses and making their decisions for all manner of reasons. They may have built wealth through other assets when younger.

Wealth and income don’t always correlate when you’re our age. Most of us recall borrowing to buy property when the price was less than double our annual household income. Interest rates were double-digit, but they eventually waned.

With older boomers dying off, maybe we are also seeing the inheritanc­e moneybomb beginning to hit.

We can’t prove this over-50s behaviour is mirrored in the New Zealand population, as Stats NZ doesn’t show economic inactivity by age group. A look at their website didn’t uncover it.

We monitor mullet-inactivity (youth who are not in education, employment or training) and give everyone else a boringbob known as the ‘‘underutili­sation rate’’. This runs at 9% and includes people who would like more hours, or who are seeking employment now or fairly soon. It should be reworked into a more truthful unemployme­nt rate.

Enticing this highly productive age group back into the workforce is what’s being discussed in the UK.

One industry noticing a big uptick in over 50s is hospitalit­y.

Caterer.com says ‘‘hospitalit­y is seeing the most dramatic ever transforma­tion to its workforce’’, noting that employers had seen a surge in this demographi­c.

Despite knowing the complexiti­es of financial decision-making, the ‘‘silver exodus’’ trend still bothers me.

‘‘Lifestyle’’ may have come under the pandemic microscope, but retirement planning is a telescope out to age 90. That’s 35 to 40 years if you’re 50-something.

Mortgages are gone, kids are going or gone. Savings can be vast. Most couples should be living off one salary and saving a salary at this stage of their lives.

Have you calculated the impact of financial inactivity? Let’s punch out some numbers to make us think.

If you can get a job paying $68,000 a year, it’s $52,000 after tax, or $1000 a week in savings.

Saving $1000 a week for 15 years with market returns of 7% (after fees and tax) will give a lump sum of $1.35 million. With an 8% return, this increases to $1.46m. Saving $1000 a week for 10 years gives $742,800. Saving $1000 a week for 5 years gives $309,100. Given we’re sitting at market lows, working now and investing could be one of the most lucrative financial decisions of your life.

If you’re 50 to 65 years old, the opportunit­y cost of inactivity is high when viewed through this telescope.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand