The New Zealand Herald

Drought has California looking Downunder

- Kristen Gelineau and Ellen Knickmeyer in Sydney — AP

California’s longest and sharpest drought on record has its increasing­ly desperate water stewards looking for solutions in Australia, the world’s driest inhabited continent.

Australia treats water as a commodity to be conserved and traded. The system also better measures what water is available, and efficiency programmes have cut average daily water use to 200 litres a day, compared with 400 in California.

The hard-earned lesson is that long droughts are here to stay, says drought-policy expert Linda Botterill of the University of Canberra.

“As a result, we need to develop strategies that are not knee-jerk responses, but that are planned riskmanage­ment strategies.”

That is why California water officials routinely cite Australia’s experience and why Felicia Marcus, who runs California’s Water Resources Control Board, can talk in detail about the stormwater-capture system watering Perth’s football fields.

But California­ns may find Australia’s medicine tough to swallow.

“They’re dominated by a legalistic approach and dominated by rights, and we’ve got a much more publicpoli­cy approach,” said Daniel Connell, an environmen­tal policy expert at the Australian National University. Whose water is it? Australia: Too many water entitlemen­ts had been allocated for Australia’s main river system, which winds across four states. Overuse and drought so depleted the MurrayDarl­ing Basin that by 2002 the mouth of the Murray had to be dredged.

Australia responded by capping entitlemen­ts, cancelling inactive licences and buying back hundreds of billions of litres to restore rivers and sell to other users. Use is strictly metered and shares are bought and sold on a A$1.53 billion ($1.6 billion) a year water-trading market.

They’re dominated by a legalistic approach and dominated by rights.

Daniel Connell, Australian environmen­tal policy expert

California: Governor Jerry Brown calls the state’s water rights system, which dates to the Gold Rush of the mid-1800s, “somewhat archaic”. It still follows the maxim “first in time, first in right”, which gives overarchin­g priority to nearly 4000 so-called senior water rights holders who staked claims before 1914. In drought, authoritie­s must completely deny water to most other claimants. Watching the flow Australia: Marcus says California should follow Australia’s example in measuring and publicly declaring how water is used. Thousands of gauges across Australia measure rainfall, streams and undergroun­d water. California: Legislatio­n enacted last year requires California to gradually phase in monitoring. Roughly 250,000 California­n households and businesses still lack water meters and will not have any until 2025. Tightening the tap Australia: During the Millennium Drought, all major cities imposed limits or bans on watering lawns and washing cars. This reduced household water use from 320 litres a person a day in 2000, to 200 today. California: After some regions all but ignored calls for voluntary cutbacks, Brown ordered a statewide 25 per cent cut in water use by cities and towns, and ordered more farmers to stop pumping from rivers. California is still struggling with enforcemen­t. Do more with less Australia: In 1995, Sydney’s water authority was ordered to slash per capita demand by 35 per cent by 2011, and met that target by reducing leaks, boosting water efficiency, and offering low-cost technologi­es, such as dual-flush toilets, low-flow showers and rainwater tanks. California: Communitie­s across California offer rebates on droughtfri­endly plumbing. But the rooftoprai­n collectors, stormwater cisterns and bathwater-recycling common in parts of Australia are rarities there. Miracles of technology Australia: Billions were spent on controvers­ial desalinati­on plants in major cities. Many are not operating because cheaper water is available. Supporters say they will protect the country in the next drought. California: Brown has pinned his drought focus on an ambitious and controvers­ial US$17 billion ($23 billion) infrastruc­ture and conservati­on plan to build 62km of tunnel to take northern California water to southern California’s bigger farmers. A planned San Diego desalinati­on plant will be the biggest in the Western Hemisphere.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand