From concrete jungle
In the last of our series looking at Auckland and Paris, Jamie Morton discovers how the City of Sails can unlock more green spaces in the city
Auckland’s distinctly pink Lightpath cycleway has been celebrated around the world as a tour de force of urban architecture. University of Auckland ecologist Dr Margaret Stanley disagrees. “It’s a lost opportunity,” she says. “You’re just separating people from the environment.”
Stanley — who would have much preferred a design like New York’s High Line, a 2.3km-long, foliage-laden “linear park” built from a stretch of disused railroad — saw the design as symptomatic of what she considers a detachment from nature.
Auckland has a stunning array of regional parks on its back doorstep, yet recent research has suggested the knowledge, confidence and ability of city-dwellers to enjoy simple things such as camping and tramping was dropping.
Yet research has shown that trees can benefit us in more ways than we can imagine.
Their very presence has been shown to improve the health of pregnant women, speed up recovery times among hospital patients and cut the use of anti-depressants.
They reduce stormwater run-off affecting our harbours and suck hundreds of tonnes of pollution from the environment each year.
On average, about 85,000 trees are planted each year on Auckland’s regional park network, helping remove about 956 kilotonnes equivalent of carbon dioxide.
And last month, Auckland Mayor Phil Goff launched Million Trees, a programme that would plant a million mainly native trees and shrubs across the region over three years.
By 2040, Auckland Council wants to increase the carbon sequestration rate by 50 per cent through planting new ecological corridors.
Yet Stanley is concerned for the welfare of trees in Auckland’s concrete jungle, particularly since the removal of general tree protection from urban areas that came with Resource Management Act reforms.
Sixty-three per cent of urban forest in the Auckland isthmus lies on private land — and just 15 per cent of that is protected through the notable tree schedule.
Auckland Council expects more than 400,000 new dwellings will have to be built in the next 30 years to cope with a further million residents, with between 60 to 70 per cent of them to be located within the urban area as apartments, infill housing and town houses.
This would mean some public open spaces would have to be used more intensively, as residents used local parks, streets or squares for activities that may have traditionally occurred in the suburban backyard.
New parks would need to be acquired, existing parks would have to upgraded and our streets would become an integral part of Auckland’s open space network.
Auckland Council has set out a strategy to manage this growth while preserving and enhancing green spaces — including greenways plans for all local board areas — but Stanley fears intensification would inevitably lead to a major loss in urban forest.
Paris’ efforts showed the city has been heading the other way.
While the densely developed French capital holds more than 400 municipal parklands and gardens, making it one of the most wooded capitals in Europe, this doesn’t compare to the abundance of nature Auckland has in its 40,000ha of regional parkland and myriad smaller spaces.
A hot summer day sees its Luxembourg Garden, one of its few large inner-city major parks, crammed with Parisians.
But the French city has been exploring clever new ways to green itself.
This year it passed a law that meant anyone could plant flowers, vegetables, fruit and other plants on the walls, fences and rooftops of their workplaces and homes.
Parisians have taken to the idea, transforming their properties into gardens.
By 2020, by which time Paris wants to have cut greenhouse gas emissions by a quarter, Mayor Anne Hidalgo wants to have created 100ha of these new “living walls” and green roofs.
It was something French lawmakers even considered becoming compulsory before the legislation was scrapped by France’s former Government. Conceptual designs that came out of the 2050 Paris Smart City project — imagining a Paris producing 75 per cent less greenhouse gas emissions — show a science fictionlike world of honeycomb apartment blocks that double as vertical forests. It demonstrated how even built-up cities could still act as hotspots for nature — and how a remarkable number of species lived among our urban environment.
One Auckland study found 982 different beetle species in Lynfield parks and reserves.
But in our city, said Stanley, greenery was under pressure and vegetation corridors that helped plants and animals to move through the landscape were being lost.
As native fungi and insects were often host-specific to native plants — and native birds also often preferentially fed on native plants — it was more than just trees that we lost.
Frustratingly, trees lost to development were too often replaced with weedy palms or low-maintenance shrubs, Stanley said, although native planting guidelines had been factored into the city’s strategy.
Although there were efforts around the city to introduce more greenery, from pop-up parks to the North-West Wildlink project, which has been building a green bridge between the Waitakeres and the gulf islands for a decade, Stanley has argued for more action.
That included rates rebates for properties with large trees, more control of weeds and pests and, of course, more awareness.
Could the non-playing areas of golf courses — covering 943ha in Auckland — have more biodiversity and Auckland’s Nelson St Cycleway is a stark contrast to New York’s trees for sequestering carbon?
Do we really need mown berms and can these be planted out as they are in other countries, such as Australia?
“Planting berms could help with sequestering carbon, stops emissions
You’re just separating people from the environment. Ecologist Dr Margaret Stanley
and pollutants from lawnmowers, saves water in summer, and encourages biodiversity such as pollinators.
“Could the edges of playing fields be planted out? Are playgrounds sterile or do they have plantings? How