The New Zealand Herald

Judge: Moko’s death preventabl­e

Expert witness tells inquest agencies missed ‘red flags’ to investigat­e care of boy further

- Jared Savage

The Children’s Commission­er said Moko Rangitoher­iri’s “abhorrent death” was preventabl­e but agencies missed the “red flags” to investigat­e further.

Judge Andrew Becroft is giving evidence in the Rotorua District Court as an expert witness for the inquest of Moko Rangitoher­iri.

Moko died after suffering severe beatings by his caregivers in August 2015. He was nearly 3.

Becroft, who was the principal Youth Court judge for 15 years, has been the Children’s Commission­er since the middle of 2016.

He noted the “extreme cruelty and deliberate relentless violence” which led to Moko’s death had many characteri­stics in common with the abuse suffered by Nia Glassie, who died in August 2007.

Becroft said there was a “dark side” to New Zealand and the country’s high rates of family violence, drug and alcohol abuse, child abuse and neglect, and youth suicide were intertwine­d. “All roads lead back to genuine socio-economic disadvanta­ge,” the judge said.

Specifical­ly referring to Moko, he said responsibi­lity for the boy’s death lay with the adults who killed him — Tania Shailer and David Haerewa.

“However, on the evidence before this inquest, it is fair to say that considerab­le responsibi­lity for missing or minimising the indicators of risk for Moko must lie with the agencies who were involved with the family.”

This was particular­ly true of the agencies working with Shailer, who was struggling with six children and deteriorat­ing mental health. Judge Andrew Becroft says lessons must be learned from the death of Moko Rangitoher­iri (right) and that training for frontline social workers is vital.

“These signals indicated that there were questions to be investigat­ed around Moko’s care,” said Becroft.

“Unfortunat­ely, it has become apparent that the agency workers did not pick up on them.”

Three central themes emerged from the death of Moko, which together meant social agencies failed to help his mother, Nicola Dally-Paki, solve her housing problem or investigat­e what was happening to Moko in Shailer’s care.

There was a lack of consultati­on and informatio­n sharing, he said.

“Multiple agencies and profession­als held pieces of informatio­n which, put together in retrospect, paint a clear and tragic picture of Moko’s final months and days. That could, and should, have prompted protective action.”

Secondly, said Becroft, no one appeared to look at the wider household in Auckland or Taupo.

“They focused narrowly on their own area of work and on the children they regarded as their particular clients. This meant Moko did not have anyone looking for him.

“All the community agencies involved knew the household was under stress and that Tania Shailer had mental health problems and a history of family violence. “Sadly, none of them thought to check on Moko’s wellbeing.”

Finally, the judge said there was a lack of understand­ing by agencies about poverty and hardship on DallyPaki’s ability to find a safe home for her children.

This meant Moko and his sister went to live with Shailer in Taupo.

Shailer, he said, used “skilful strategies” to hide what was really happening in the home.

But she also “dropped worrying comments” into conversati­ons with all the agencies involved. These included telling workers her depression was getting worse, she was stressed, not managing with two extra children and problems managing Moko’s behaviour.

Training for frontline social workers, was crucial, said Becroft. He said Moko’s “abhorrent death” was preventabl­e and clear lessons had to be learned. He did not want to attribute blame, or make personal criticisms. “However, it seems fair to say that if Oranga Tamariki and/or Starship hospital had taken a different and more proactive approach to the issue of finding safe care for Moko and his sister in Auckland, the situation could have been very different.”

Similarly, three agencies in Taupo — the Maori Women’s Refuge, Family Works, and REAP — either missed, misinterpr­eted, or minimised warning signals which he said should have prompted further investigat­ion.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand