The New Zealand Herald

Sex offences vanish

Police miscoded thousands of assaults over 20 years as ‘no crime’, Herald investigat­ion discovers

- Story: Kirsty Johnston Data: Chris Knox

Thousands of reported sex offences disappeare­d from official statistics over a 20-year period after police inappropri­ately coded many actual assaults as “no crime”, a Herald investigat­ion has found.

In cases such as those with limited evidence, or where victims were intoxicate­d, or consent was unclear, instead of recording the incident as a “K6 — crime reported” police would label it “K3 — no crime”.

Documents show about 15 per cent of reported rapes or other sex crimes were being miscoded as recently as 2013, leading to the impression there were both fewer cases in total, and that police were solving more offences than was the case.

Because police also used the incorrect code for the small minority of fake complaints, some officers conflated the two, resulting in the mistaken belief that a huge swathe of women were liars.

“That confirms everything we’ve seen in the community,” says National Collective of Rape Crisis spokeswoma­n Andrea Black. “It’s left so many people traumatise­d. People end up taking sides, saying, ‘She lied because police aren’t investigat­ing, she’s crazy, she’s chaotic.”’

Informatio­n released to the Herald shows it took almost 10 years after academic Jan Jordan first highlighte­d the issue for police to commission their own report and move to stop the practice.

That was despite the fact police engaged an external consultant to review her work in 2004, and that her findings were later expanded upon in a paper for the Ministry of Women’s Affairs in 2009.

The police review, completed in 2013, was released only after the Office of the Ombudsman intervened. It reviewed 279 of the roughly 40 per cent of adult sexual violation offences coded K3 that year, and found 107 — or 38 per cent — were miscoded.

Based on these figures, there would have been at least 2300 victims of aggravated sexual assault in the 20 years before 2014 whose cases were written out of official data.

If non-aggravated sex assaults were also included — which they were not because of complicati­ons with the data — the number would be higher. Police redacted the main finding from their review. However, the recommenda­tions were clear. “Police must cease the practice of K3-ing sexual violation offence reports unless there is credible evidence to show that on the balance of probabilit­ies, an offence did not occur,” it said. National crime manager Superinten­dent Tim Anderson said the K3 report was never finalised, but police were no longer coding sex crimes they couldn’t resolve otherwise as “no crime”. Only 3.8 per cent of adult sexual assault cases were designated K3 in 2017, he said. Additional­ly, police had introduced a new recording system, with more nuanced codes. They had educated investigat­ors about compliance with reporting standards.

Anderson noted that sexual offences were under-reported, and that police would be concerned by the publicatio­n of any material that might inhibit reporting further.

“All of our investigat­ors are very passionate about this crime type and work very hard for and on behalf of victims and their families,” he said.

The revelation­s about the use of K3 codes are part of a wider Herald inquiry into violent sex crimes, which found 80 per cent of aggravated sexual assaults go unresolved — meaning an offender isn’t prosecuted although police believe the victim.

For the crime “male rapes female over 16”, the unresolved total was 85 per cent, the highest on record.

Advocates say prosecutio­n rates are unlikely to change until there is a reduced focus on victim behaviour, and more onus on the offender.

Parliament­ary Under-Secretary to the Minister of Justice Jan Logie said she would take recommenda­tions on reform later this year.

“We need to do better, and I am committed to doing better,” she said.

Each unresolved case means police believe an assault occurred, but an offender was never charged and taken to court for that crime.

The day Helen was raped it was cold. She remembers exactly what she was wearing when her exboyfrien­d knocked at the door, wanting to come in. It was the same thing she always wore while studying at home in winter — a hooded sweatshirt, trackpants, socks.

“Why are you here,” she asked. They’d broken up about a week earlier, after a short relationsh­ip. He’d been mean and controllin­g. She had two young children. She decided it was never going to work.

Unfortunat­ely, her ex didn’t see it the same way. He’d been texting her incessantl­y since the break-up, and now he wanted to talk in person, he said. He was quite aggressive about it. Reluctantl­y, Helen let him in.

Three years on, she still has flashbacks to the assault — of him pushing her down, the pain. Afterwards, while collecting her youngest child from kindergart­en, she broke down crying. The teacher advised her to call the police, but all Helen wanted was a shower. Standing sobbing under the water, she scrubbed her thighs so raw the skin came off.

When she phoned the police that night, they booked a medical check straight away. Doctors were able to collect DNA the next day. The bruises on her legs matched where her attacker had forced her against the metal bed. She had other, internal, injuries as well. Detectives examined her bedding, her clothes. Helen gave a long video interview.

Police believed her, Helen says. But her case never got to court.

During questionin­g, the man’s lawyer said they planned to argue Helen had opened the door in skimpy clothing, that she seduced him. They also wanted to use her sexual history against her, the fact that she had two children to two different fathers, one at age 19.

With DNA effectivel­y ruled out because of the recent relationsh­ip, the case would largely come down to Helen’s word against her attacker’s, police told her. By then, Helen was suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder, including anxiety and insomnia.

“I was struggling mentally. Police thought I would be a mess in court,” she says. “They thought I would be too weak . . . and that we would lose.”

Lacking the necessary evidence, police closed the file. Somewhere out there is Helen’s assailant, an untried rapist. In official statistics, her case is considered “unresolved”.

Helen’s story is not isolated. A Herald investigat­ion found 2400 reported violent sex crimes went “unresolved” in 2016. Each unresolved case means police believe an assault occurred, but an offender was never charged.

Since 1994, official data says almost 14,000 aggravated sexual assaults in total were unresolved. However, the Herald can reveal that, because an unknown swathe of sex crimes were categorise­d in a way that meant they were effectivel­y removed from statistics, the true number of unresolved cases over the past 25 years is likely to be thousands more.

According to current police data, as of 2016 up to 80 per cent of reported aggravated sexual assaults go unresolved. For the crime “male rapes female 16 and over”, that number is even higher, at 85 per cent. Rape cases are four times less likely to go to court in comparison with other types of physical assault, where only 24 per cent of offences are unresolved.

Official statistics say the rate of unresolved violent sex offences is higher now than at any time since records began. For most of the 1990s, and early 2000s, the unresolved rate hovered around 55 per cent. But after 2007 the rate began to climb rapidly, so that when plotted on a graph the data looks like the steep, jagged rise of a mountain incline. The empty space below the incline represents 13,914 victims left in limbo, their stories unheard, their attackers untried.

On the face of it, one could assume the driver behind the spike in unresolved cases was the overall increase in reporting rates. Data shows reporting has also climbed steadily in the last decade. But while more reporting might account for some of the upward swing in unresolved cases, it doesn’t tally with such a sharp, rapid change. Instead, the more likely explanatio­n is that the true rate has simply been misreporte­d all along.

During its investigat­ion, the Herald discovered that historic police data on sex crimes is deeply misleading. For at least 20 years since collection began in 1994, police were incorrectl­y coding some sexual assaults as “no crime”. Where cases had limited evidence, or victims were intoxicate­d, or consent was unclear, instead of recording the incident as a “K6 — crime reported” police would instead label it “K3 — no offence disclosed” or “no crime”.

Documents released by police after Ombudsman interventi­on suggest the inappropri­ate use of the “no crime” code in upwards of 15 per cent of cases. Not only did this distort crime statistics to seem as though fewer sexual assaults were being reported, but it kept the “unresolved” rate artificial­ly low for years, because K3 cases disappear from official counts.

Worse, because the catch-all K3 code was also used for the small minority of fake claims, academics say it led some police officers to conflate the two totals, resulting in the incorrect belief that a huge proportion of women were liars, and not to be trusted.

Police documents show the K3 practice continued despite Victoria University criminolog­ist Jan Jordan highlighti­ng the issue in a 2004 research paper, and the issue arising again in a 2009 study for the Ministry of Women’s Affairs. In fact, while its use began to decline after 2007, the inappropri­ate use of K3 wasn’t acknowledg­ed by police until 2013, when an informal review was commission­ed into 279 sex cases coded “no crime”, in which the reviewer said its overuse should cease immediatel­y.

According to the Herald’s findings, the inappropri­ate use of the K3 code means that in addition to the thousands of people with official “unresolved” cases like Helen’s, there could have been at least 2300 more men and women from the 20 years to 2014 who, despite reporting aggravated sexual assaults to police, never had it recognised they were a probable victim of a sex crime. If you include non-aggravated sex assaults as well — which the Herald did not — that number would be thousands higher again.

“That confirms everything we’ve seen in the community,” National Collective of Rape Crisis spokeswoma­n Andrea Black says.

“It’s left so many people traumatise­d. People end up taking sides, saying ‘she lied because police aren’t investigat­ing, she’s crazy, she’s chaotic.”’

Police, who have spent the past 10 years improving the way they deal with sexual assault following a Commission of Inquiry into Police Conduct, say they are no longer coding sex crimes they can’t resolve otherwise as “no offence”. Just 3.8 per cent of adult sexual assault cases were designated K3 in 2017, police said.

Jan Jordan, who recently reviewed three months of police files from 2015, say her preliminar­y results suggest detectives are now truly reluctant to use the code for reported sex crimes. Compared to 2004, files are much more detailed, with more work put in before decisions about prosecutio­n are made, Jordan said.

Additional­ly, police have introduced a new recording system, with codes for outcomes such as “not pursued” or “investigat­ion suspended”, allowing officers to add nuance when they close a file, and for more detail in official data sets. They have also educated investigat­ors about compliance with reporting standards.

What that all means is that, for the first time, we are probably seeing an accurate picture of the true rate of unresolved sexual assault cases in New Zealand.

It comes amid a sea-change moment for the campaign against sexual violence, where dozens of women have named their high-profile abusers as part of the #MeToo movement, where judges who blame victims will have their rulings overturned, and where the stigma and shame of sexual violence is being replaced with a mood of empowermen­t and change.

Much of the current debate centres around low reporting rates, and the need for victims to come forward, to follow the right channels, to be brave. However, what the Herald’s investigat­ion has found is even when victims do the “right thing” there is a very low chance their attacker will even get to court, let alone be convicted, despite police certainty their victims are telling the truth.

“The public awareness and internatio­nal awareness is awesome but brings with it people who say I’m going to do something about my assault, I feel strong, society has changed . . . and then they go into that process and they wait in limbo,” Black says. “They speak up and take action and then it’s like: bam, stop, block, wait.”

For women like Helen, it leaves a deep sense of frustratio­n with the system that is supposed to help them.

“It’s flawed,” she says. “And that’s why so many women don’t go through with it.”

In New Zealand, the crime of rape carries a maximum penalty of 20 years’ imprisonme­nt. In terms of severity, it is second only to murder, and the most serious methamphet­amine offices, on the sentencing scale. Unlawful sexual connection has a maximum penalty of 18 years. Between them, the two categories make up the majority of reported cases of aggravated sexual assault.

While some less serious offences are able to be resolved out of court, alternativ­e resolution­s do not apply to sex crimes. There are no warnings, no mediation. Rape either goes to court, to be heard in front of a jury, or it doesn’t. Aside from the very small proportion of cases now deemed “no crime”, almost all of the cases which don’t make it are deemed “unresolved”.

To find out why so many of New Zealand’s reported sexual assaults do not reach court, the

Herald spent six months speaking with victims, police, sexual violence advocates, lawyers, police and academics.

It reviewed studies and government reports, including Dame Margaret Bazley’s 2007 Inquiry into Police Conduct, and the subsequent monitoring updates. It found the reasons cases aren’t put forward for prosecutio­n not only involve police practices, but in large part stem from inadequaci­es in the wider justice system, and the deeply entrenched views about rape still prevalent within society itself.

Ten years ago, it is almost certain that — fair or not — much of the blame for the unresolved cases would have been levelled squarely at police investigat­ors.

However, sexual violence experts and advocates almost unanimousl­y agreed that since Bazley’s inquiry into police culture, there has a been significan­t change in the way police handle reported sexual assault.

The inquiry, commission­ed after Louise Nicholas accused four police officers of rape in 2004, found major failings with the way police handled sexual assault cases, and a “culture of scepticism” about rape complainan­ts.

It prompted an overhaul of police practice and policy, including better training, specialist sexual assault investigat­ion teams, better communicat­ion with victims and more rigorous oversight of sexual assault files.

The changes were so widespread that the final police report, “A Decade of Change”, released on the 10-year anniversar­y of the inquiry last year, ran to 40 pages. It covered each of Bazley’s initial 47 recommenda­tions, with specific details about each point.

For example, police noted they now have 105 trained investigat­ors who specialise in investigat­ing adult sexual assault complaints. In 2007, there were none. A “quality assurance” framework ensures files are audited both at district and national level.

The improvemen­ts have been noticed by victims as well as critics.

Grace, who was sexually assaulted as a teenager, said the first time she tried to report it to police in the 1990s, she was told her case would never get to court, and not to bother with a formal statement.

But when Grace complained again in 2015, prompted by news reports of allegation­s against high-profile entertaine­rs such as Bill Cosby and Jimmy Savile, police doggedly tracked down her offender and charged him. While the charges were later dropped because of issues with the historic nature of the crime, she said the police had done a good job.

“The detective said to me, ‘I believe you’,” Grace said. “Even though there wasn’t the outcome I wanted it was so much better that before, to be believed, to have [her abuser] put in a cell even for one night.”

Jordan, one of the country’s most experience­d sexual violence researcher­s and an expert on police practice, said there had been a huge change in investigat­ors’ attitudes.

Her current study, a review of sexual assault files from 2015, was supposed to examine a year of case work, but she found the files so detailed she only needed three months’ worth to see trends emerge.

While detectives still struggled at times with complex cases of intimate partner violence, or with victims who were intellectu­ally disabled, they were much better at keeping an open mind, Jordan said.

“Cases which in the past would signal red flags, for example cases where victims were intoxicate­d, or suffered mental illness . . . police now suspend any judgment they might have while doing the investigat­ion.”

Jordan noticed discretion around decisions to prosecute were no longer in the hands of a single officer, and files were reviewed by more senior detectives.

“They really are trying a lot harder before making a decision on court,” Jordan said.

Some names have been changed to protect privacy.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ?? Source: Statistics NZ, NZN Police / Herald graphic ??
Source: Statistics NZ, NZN Police / Herald graphic

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand