University’s ranking drop a big blow

There is no doubt the University of Auckland’s drop in world ranking is a blow for the tertiary institution and New Zealand. Only two years ago, the university was rated 165th in the Times Higher Education rankings. They began in 2004 and are widely used by students and their families to help inform their choice of learning establishment — even if the rankings’ stated aim is more as a comprehensive database of the world’s best universities.

Last year, Auckland’s ranking dropped to 192. This year it has dropped out of the top 200 altogether, and is now sitting with an unspecified rating in the 201-250 band — a situation Auckland’s deputy vice-chancellor John Morrow says is “more damaging reputationally”.

That leaves no New Zealand universities in that top 200, compared with nine in Australia. This has prompted fears our transtasman neighbour could cash in with international students looking for a Southern Hemisphere learning experience — or for wealthier New Zealand students who may eye up opportunities across the Tasman.

There is no doubt tertiary education has become big business, and the drop in rankings has inevitably put the spotlight back on funding.

Universities New Zealand chief executive Chris Whelan has previously said the decline in funding is contributing to universities’ drop in international ranking tables.

Morrow says our universities receive much less funding per student than institutions elsewhere. While the Government’s first-year fees-free scheme may have reduced the debt burden for students, Morrow says the multimillion dollar injection added nothing to universities’ incomes.

In May, before the Government’s first Budget, Tertiary Education Union president Sandra Grey said tertiary education spending was $3.7 billion short, and New Zealand Institutes of Technology and Polytechnics spokesman Charles Finny said funding had not kept pace with costs.

Governments, oppositions, unions, universities and students will always argue over the numbers, although the rankings do tell a story — as does the 5 per cent loss in international students after tough new requirements came in last year.

However, some of those were made for fears low standards were eroding the quality of our institutions, qualifications and reputations.

We can’t afford that and we can’t afford bottomless taxpayer funding either. But neither can we afford to lose the lucrative international student market, worth some $4.5b to the economy.

As everyone is finding in this competitive market, where tertiary education has become something of a commodity, trade-offs are inevitable.

Universities must be able to innovate to survive. But the yield of anything is directly related to what is invested in it.

If “results” in rankings, student numbers and money in the bank is desirable, there is surely no option but to invest more to help universities regain their footing.

Otherwise the continued slide seems inevitable.

This newspaper is subject to NZ Media Council procedures. A complaint must first be directed in writing, within one month of publication, to formalcomplaints@nzherald.co.nz. If dissatisfied, the complaint may be sent to the Media Council, P O Box 10-879, The Terrace, Wellington 6143. Or use the online complaint form at www.mediacouncil.org.nz Include copies of the article and all correspondence with the publication.