The New Zealand Herald

Human rights declaratio­n relevant as ever at 70

- Paula Tesoriero comment Paula Tesoriero is Acting Chief Human Rights Commission­er.

Anniversar­ies often prompt reflection. Today’s 70th Anniversar­y of the Universal Declaratio­n of Human Rights is a useful moment to look at what we have achieved in terms of human rights and what more we need to do.

New Zealand was one of the 48 states that proclaimed the Declaratio­n at the United Nations General Assembly in Paris, on December 10, 1948. The declaratio­n, which includes 30 articles and a preamble, was worked on by representa­tives from around the world, including our Prime Minister Peter Fraser.

Supporting Fraser were South Canterbury Hospital Board member and political activist, Ann Newlands, and a young lawyer and diplomat, Colin Aikman, who was studying in London.

While the declaratio­n sets out fundamenta­l principles, it doesn’t bind countries to adopt them. Instead, countries commit to implementi­ng the broad set of rights by ratifying two treaties: the Internatio­nal Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the Internatio­nal Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights.

The first covenant includes the right to life, freedom of religion, speech and assembly, electoral rights and the rights to due process and a fair trial. The second covenant covers labour rights; and the rights to health, education and an adequate standard of living.

Together, they are referred to as the Internatio­nal Bill of Human Rights, which is the foundation of internatio­nal human rights law. Our own Bill of Rights Act does not fully reflect the Internatio­nal Bill of Human Rights. It does not contain all the civil and political rights (such as privacy and property rights) and none of the economic, social and cultural rights.

Later this week, I will be reporting to the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva on the status of human rights in New Zealand. In effect, I will be looking at how well we have lived up to the ideals we signed up to 70 years ago. In my presentati­on to the council, I will be able to report a great deal of positive change in New Zealand over the past five years.

Equal pay advocates have achieved a game-changing settlement for aged care workers. Other steps have been taken towards eliminatin­g the gender pay gap, including the introducti­on of updated pay equity legislatio­n.

Reforms to address family violence against women have been introduced.

A child poverty reduction bill has been introduced to Parliament.

The Optional Protocol on Rights of Persons with Disabiliti­es has been ratified.

A fairer system is to be introduced for home-based carers.

This progress should be celebrated. However, there remains a lot to do. Waiting lists for social housing have doubled in the past two years. Rates of family violence and child abuse remain among the highest in the OECD. Almost 30 per cent of New Zealand children live in households whose income falls below the official poverty line. Structural discrimina­tion means a disproport­ionate number of Ma¯ori, Pacific people, women, migrants, refugees, members of the Rainbow community and disabled people face barriers to accessing services.

To start addressing these issues, the Human Rights Commission believes New Zealand needs to bring our human rights legislatio­n and policy into line with our internatio­nal obligation­s and elevate the Treaty of Waitangi to its rightful status at the centre of New Zealand’s constituti­on.

The people who created the declaratio­n were working in the shadow of a world war while facing the threat of a cold war. But because the work of securing full human rights continues, the declaratio­n is as relevant today as it ever has been.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand