Berm parking under threat
Transport agency wants fines but AA is biting back
First people were asked to mow their berms, now Auckland Council is seeking a law change to ban parking on them — a move that could affect urban areas across the country.
But a motorists’ watchdog has hit back, saying the city should sort out parking shortages rather than punishing car owners.
Auckland Transport (AT) is campaigning for a law change allowing it to fine people for parking on grass roadside berms that don’t have “no parking” signs.
AT’s traffic bylaw prohibits parking on grass berms. But Land Transport Act rules mean “no parking” signs must be installed every 100 metres to enforce the ban.
On Sunday Waitemata¯ Local Board chair Pippa Coom, on behalf of the council, will seek support from Local Government New Zealand (LGNZ) at its Wellington conference to lobby the Government for a law change.
Coom said parking on berms could damage underground utilities, create safety issues for footpath users and rip up the grass, preventing berms acting in their primary capacities to soak up and filter stormwater.
“If parking is an issue, then that needs to be addressed. Parking on berms should not be a solution.
“And having to install signs at 100-metre intervals on a street to enforce the rules is just farcical.
“We are seeking legislation change to clarify the rules to allow councils to prohibit parking on berms in urban areas if they choose.”
Between August 2016 and last August, AT received 840 safety complaints about berm parking.
In a submission to the NZ Transport Agency last year AT wrote: “Drivers in Auckland are becoming aware that AT do not issue infringement
notices for parking on the grass verge unless signage has been installed. As more drivers become aware, the problems increase in areas without signage and AT is unable to take action.
“Parking on the grass verge is causing substantial safety risks in Auckland,” the submission said.
But the Automobile Association opposes any blanket ban.
Spokesman Mark Stockdale said sweeping prohibitions would create problems for car users.
“At the moment parking on berms is very accepted in some areas. Most people across the country have to maintain and mow their berms, so there is an expectation you can park on them if needed, such as when you have extra guests for birthday parties, family gatherings or sports events.”
In urban areas with few carparks some people were simply trying to be courteous and not block narrow streets, he said. “Shortage of parking needs to be addressed before banning parking on berms.”
Stockdale agreed the number of cars on berms could get “out of control”, and there could be damage to underground utilities in places.
“But in those pressure points there should be signs installed, rather than a blanket ban.”
Auckland berm issues are not new. A controversial plan change in 2013/14 sparked outrage when residents had to mow their own berms.
But the council will mow people’s berms if they are unable to do so themselves and meet certain criteria.
Mayor Phil Goff said council investment in public transport would reduce the need for people to use their cars. “We don’t want a city with hundreds of signs saying ‘do not park here’. We want the ability to say it is illegal to park on berms, in areas where it is obstructing pedestrians and residents living there, digging up the grass and creating mess — we don’t want that.”
AT spokesman Mark Hannan said installing no parking signs across the city was both costly — about $50,000 per street — and time consuming.
Only 33 streets have signs for now — representing just 0.36 of the city’s 9000 streets. AT could issue $40 fines for berm parking in those places.
Ministry of Transport mobility and safety manager Brent Johnston said several councils had raised transport bylaw issues around councils being able to fine motorists parked on berms.
Under a new bylaw in 2017, Christchurch City Council declared it an offence to park on a grass or paved berm where there is a kerb.
We want the ability to say it is illegal to park on berms, in areas where it is obstructing pedestrians and residents living there...
Mayor Phil Goff
What do you think?