The New Zealand Herald

What shortage?

Aucklander­s splurge on water

-

Council-owned and operated water suppliers should be merged and corporatis­ed if they can’t improve on their own, the Productivi­ty Commission says.

It says the three-waters sector needs “fundamenta­l” reform, and noted the Government is considerin­g extensive changes to the sector’s regulatory framework and how it is funded.

“Considerab­le evidence shows poor performanc­e of the three waters sector in many parts of New Zealand, in terms of their impact on human health, the natural environmen­t, productivi­ty and costs to consumers and ratepayers,” the commission said in a draft report on local government funding arrangemen­ts.

“However, some councils and providers are taking the tough decisions needed to improve performanc­e, including Auckland’s Watercare, Tauranga City Council, Kapiti Coast District Council and the five councils involved in Wellington Water.”

The draft report cites the Commerce Commission as a natural fit to be the industry watchdog given its experience regulating other monopoly industries. The draft view is for the Government to task a regulator to set a deadline for councils to lift their game, and if they didn’t meet the minimums, come up with a backstop arrangemen­t.

“The backstop would take the form of compulsori­ly merging water businesses, placing them in CCO [council-controlled organisati­ons] structures with independen­t financing and requiring them to move to being fully funded directly from water consumers rather than from council rates,” it said.

“This approach would provide the

Government with a set of workable reforms that will achieve what matters — tackling the unacceptab­le performanc­e levels for three waters — while constraini­ng fiscal costs. It avoids the Government becoming unnecessar­ily involved in the specifics of how to lift performanc­e and navigating every local circumstan­ce.”

Local Government Minister Nanaia Mahuta has previously said she would take proposals for major reform of three waters funding to Cabinet in June of this year, with a view to making a final decision by the end of the year. Local Government New Zealand has urged the Government to focus on drinking water first, and allow new freshwater management standards set in 2017 to run their course through to 2025.

Local authoritie­s already spend a large proportion of their funds on the management of water, stormwater, and wastewater, and improving those systems will add to existing fiscal pressures.

The current framework imposes weak discipline­s and incentives on council-led water suppliers to meet safety and environmen­tal minimums, with limited oversight of charging and costs.

The commission said the natural monopoly features of three waters isn’t the reason for their poor performanc­e. Rather, because councils have often put a priority on keeping direct control, they haven’t been able to achieve the necessary skills needed.

“Councils ought to be focused on service performanc­e, which for many

Councils ought to be focused on service performanc­e, which for many will require the requisite expertise and much of that may only come from increased scale. Productivi­ty Commission

will require the requisite expertise and much of that may only come from increased scale. This could come from merging with other providers and/or pursuing expansion opportunit­ies,” the report said.

Other than Auckland’s Watercare and Wellington Water — a joint venture of five councils in the region — water suppliers’ governance is carried out by elected councillor­s and their officials.

The commission says that “will be compromisi­ng supplier performanc­e and muddying their accountabi­lity to councils”.

It also reduces accountabi­lity, which ultimately flows through to weak performanc­e discipline­s and incentives, as does funding water systems through rates.

The commission said effective regulation would impose significan­t financial penalties for breaching performanc­e requiremen­ts, and force councils to confront their shortcomin­gs.

“The Government should focus on establishi­ng an effective regulatory regime that strongly incentivis­es councils to make those tough decisions, and on offering financial assistance to communitie­s in ways that encourage performanc­e, and which are targeted to situations where a high level of assurance is needed and would be used wisely,” it said.

The report said lifting the performanc­e of the three waters sector will also assist the Government’s wellbeing framework in that safer drinking water will benefit people’s health, and better waste and stormwater systems will help the natural environmen­t.

“More efficient and cost-effective provision of three waters services will contribute to improving the country’s productivi­ty. It will also contribute to New Zealand’s internatio­nal reputation for being ‘clean and green’ by reducing the incidence of tourists becoming ill from drinking water and by reducing pollution of coastal and freshwater catchments,” it said.

 ??  ??
 ??  ?? Mangere waste water plant in Auckland, where Watercare is regarded as a provider making the tough decisions needed to lift its game.
Mangere waste water plant in Auckland, where Watercare is regarded as a provider making the tough decisions needed to lift its game.
 ??  ?? Nanaia Mahuta
Nanaia Mahuta

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand