Potatoes over property?
Govt wants to limit development on agricultural land
The Government has proposed new rules to limit urban development on the most productive farm land. But councils facing increased restrictions say they’re worried the policy will pit potatoes against property.
Environment Minister David Parker and Agriculture Minister Damien O’Connor yesterday released a draft national policy statement that could see requirements put on councils when deciding whether to allow urban development on land that could be used for agriculture.
A major report last year found 200 million tonnes of soil was being lost in New Zealand annually, with urban sprawl eating up some of the country’s most productive land.
About 14 per cent of NZ is currently considered “highly productive” by the Government’s standards.
“It’s under increasing pressure from expanding urban areas and the growing number of lifestyle blocks,” Parker said. “We cannot afford to lose our most highly productive land.
“It brings significant economic benefits, including employment for nearby communities, and adds significant value to [the] primary sector.”
Half of the nation’s earnings come from industries that use half of our land, and depend on productive soils.
Over the past decade more than 200 growers in the Auckland region alone have sold up because of rezoning and subdivisions.
Under the most significant parts of the proposed changes, regional councils would have to:
● Not allow development on highly productive land unless it’s to meet shortages. They will have to back this up with longterm cost-benefit analysis and also consider alternatives to the development;
● Make maps of land that’s “highly productive” based on specific rules;
● Change district plans to give more protection to useful land and prioritise its use for primary industries, such as farming and horticulture;
● Change rules to avoid fragmenting productive land.
“It proposes that councils be required to ensure there’s enough highly productive land available for primary production now and in the future, and protect it from inappropriate subdivision, use and development,” Parker said.
Auckland Mayor Phil Goff said elite soils were valuable and needed to be protected. “The Government’s proposed policy is consistent with the provisions in the Auckland Plan and Unitary Plan,” he said.
Auckland Council would be reviewing the proposal in detail before submitting on the policy, he said.
But Local Government New Zealand says while it supports the intention, it’s worried about what the policy may mean for local authorities in need of more housing. “We need to carefully assess and balance the trade-offs between protecting highly productive land and enabling cities to grow,” LGNZ president Dave Cull said. “In places like Auckland and Hamilton, where New Zealand’s housing affordability crisis is most severe, the only place these cities can meaningfully expand greenfield development is in the areas [the proposal] is looking to protect.” Urban environments cover only 1 per cent of land, he said. “The Government is effectively pitting potatoes against houses . . . we don’t think the discussion document has considered the implications of this sufficiently,” Cull said.
The Government will shortly also release a separate policy statement on urban development, which Parker said would create balance.
“We need to house our people and to feed them too,” Parker said. Meanwhile, Horticulture NZ said poor rules were currently seeing too much fertile land going to waste. “Once you build houses on our best soils, you cannot get them back. However, with good planning and buffer zones, houses and horticulture can co-exist,” said Michelle Sands. Act Party leader David Seymour said the changes would only lead to higher property prices in Auckland. The policy statement will now be consulted on until October 10.
We cannot afford to lose our most highly productive land.
David Parker Environment Minister