The New Zealand Herald

Demise of cultural and social icons as Bauer shuts up shop

These magazines and websites were splendid for all that. We have lost so much.

- Simon Wilson

The Listener is no more. Along with Metro, North & South, Woman’s Day, NZ Woman’s Weekly and a host of other magazines. All gone, with the sudden announceme­nt from Bauer Media NZ that it is shutting down, immediatel­y, and will not start up again.

We have lost so much and we will lose more, because where Bauer goes, others will follow. CEO Brendon Hill made the reason clear enough: the Covid-19 crisis has destroyed Bauer’s advertisin­g support. “Publishing in New Zealand,” he said, “is very dependent on advertisin­g revenue and it is highly unlikely that demand will ever return to pre-crisis levels.”

It’s true, and it’s also true for commercial radio and television. That hasn’t always been widely understood. Without advertisin­g, the only media we would have is statefunde­d or, in niche markets, subscripti­on funded.

The Bauer titles are cultural and community treasures. Many of them have spoken truth to power, repeatedly over the years. They share a long, proud record for quality writing; for long-form and in-depth journalism; for insightful, entertaini­ng and authoritat­ive cultural analysis. If all their awards were lined up, the certificat­es would smother many walls.

They have also done much more. Magazines are part of the glue that sticks communitie­s together. It’s as true for the readers of NZ Woman’s Weekly as it is for Metro, that magazines engage their readers in a world, enliven that world and give readers a sense of belonging to it.

All media does these things, but magazines, with their invitation to readers to return, to savour them, are especially good at it. And Bauer titles have been to the fore.

The Listener has been our publicatio­n of cultural record since 1939, leading the way nationally in its coverage of books, the arts, social issues and so much more.

Lois Daish and Annabel Langbein were the first to bring a modern sensibilit­y to food writing, in their alternatin­g columns in the 1970s and 80s. In the same period Tom Scott created a whole new way to do politics, by treating MPs as deeply flawed characters in an ongoing comedy, which he both wrote and drew cartoons about. His column became one of the great democratis­ing influences in our history. The legacy was brilliantl­y continued by writers Denis Welch and then Jane Clifton, and cartoonist­s Trace Hodgson and Chris Slane.

Diana Wichtel did a similar thing in television, with sly wit and immense grace, and powered by a revelatory view that there are good and bad versions of every type of programme. Benchmark writing.

North & South brought a sophistica­ted sensibilit­y to readers outside the metropolit­an centres, invented from nothing by editor Robyn Langwell and developed magnificen­tly by her successor, Virginia Larson. Its writers include Donna Chisholm (also in the Listener) and Mike White, both titans of contempora­ry journalism.

And there’s Metro, which I edited for five years, hoping always to honour the presiding spirit of its late, great founding editor, Warwick Roger. Its role was to be the spirit of Auckland, in love with and also highly sceptical about the city. Critically engaged for 39 years. Entertainm­ent and edificatio­n, satire and celebratio­n and a lot of advice on good eating, all poured into one heady cocktail.

Visually, too, these magazines have been indispensa­ble. Photograph­ers like Jane Ussher, David White, Alistair Guthrie and Adrian Malloch did such great work.

More Bauer titles, more leaders in their field. Home, Fashion Quarterly, Next and others. And the “mass market” titles: Woman’s Day, NZ Woman’s Weekly and Australian Women’s Weekly. Conduits to the world and mainstays in the lives of hundreds of thousands of Kiwis.

You want to know who we are, where we’ve come from, where we might be going, and what the hell is going on, and be entertaine­d — wildly, quietly, whatever suits — along the way? These magazines and their websites were splendid for all that. We have lost so much.

Now what? There’s no right answer to the question of how commercial media should make a buck. In the good old days, quality journalism in newspapers was paid for by classified advertisin­g. Then that disappeare­d online. Then a lot of other advertisin­g disappeare­d online too. Trade Me, Facebook and Google have swung like wrecking balls.

Media companies fought back, diversifyi­ng into their own online services. They’re often successful, wildly so right now, but they don’t pay for newspapers or the quality journalism expected of them.

Herald publisher NZME has responded with a digital subscripti­on service, which means online readers pay for “premium” content.

Some people say it’s not fair, especially to those on limited incomes. Yet this argument has never been raised against newspapers themselves. The digital subscripti­on is cheaper than the paper.

Some say it’s wrong to charge for important informatio­n. But we don’t, for example, make breaking news premium. A lot of our Covid-19 coverage is free, and some of it is not. There’s a balance.

Some say they object to subsidisin­g non-premium content. That’s the “why should I pay for Mike Hosking?” argument. But you don’t. Hosking is a star at NZME’s Newstalk ZB because he’s popular with listeners, so he brings in a lot of advertisin­g money.

But even his advertisin­g support has been compromise­d now. Will we climb back? That requires the advertiser­s to see a future for themselves, and not all will.

Even if they do, they’ll know the end of this crisis won’t be like the end of a war. We’re not going to flood the streets on a joyous day of victory. The return to normal will be cautious and uncertain. If we want media to survive, it will require, perhaps on a temporary basis, the attention of government. Exactly how? I don’t know. But yes, with money.

Meanwhile, RIP Bauer magazines. I miss you already.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand