The New Zealand Herald

Checkpoint clash

Top cop defends roadblocks as ‘nothing unlawful’, infuriatin­g some MPs

- Amelia Wade and Kim Moodie

The new Police Commission­er is under fire for defending community checkpoint­s that are stopping motorists to prevent the spread of Covid-19.

Andrew Coster told MPs yesterday that there was “nothing unlawful” about police-supervised roadblocks — prompting a firestorm of criticism from National MPs.

Dozens of the checkpoint­s have sprung up around the country in recent weeks as isolated townships and holiday beach communitie­s try to protect themselves from the spread of coronaviru­s.

Coster faced a grilling before Parliament’s Epidemic Response Committee yesterday, which saw a fiery exchange about police’s tolerance of the checkpoint­s.

And though he defended their legality if authorised and assisted by police, a legal expert has raised questions about private citizens pulling motorists over to question them about their travel plans or in some cases denying access.

“If a police officer is there but some random person is just pulling people over, they’re probably breaking the law and you probably could ignore it,” Wellington barrister and legal commentato­r Graeme Edgeler told the

Herald.

The community checkpoint­s — in some cases accompanie­d by banners reading: “Residents only”, or “Trespasser­s will be boiled” — began to emerge during the level 4 lockdown.

Both Coster and Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern confirmed yesterday the checkpoint­s would not be tolerated when the country moves into alert level 2.

But Hone Harawira, who set up the Tai Tokerau Border Control, signalled there could be more 24-hour checkpoint­s to stop rule breakers flouting level 3 restrictio­ns.

Harawira said they wanted to mobilise more checkpoint­s in the “near future” to protect the North’s kauma¯tua, kuia and vulnerable wha¯nau.

“We want to be able to focus on anyone, anywhere, anytime. We want to get close to vulnerable communitie­s and positive-case locations.”

Tai Tokerau Border Control had continued to operate checkpoint­s around the North Island into alert level 3 in partnershi­p with iwi and police, he said.

Drivers were no longer being made to stop and anyone who stopped voluntaril­y was offered a leaflet with Covid-19 advice.

Facing off against Coster at yesterday’s select committee, Opposition leader and committee chairman Simon Bridges repeatedly asked why police had not shut the checkpoint­s down.

“There is no scenario, and it is Law School 101, where a member of the community is acting lawfully by stopping another Kiwi on a road in New Zealand,” said Bridges, who was a Crown prosecutor before becoming an MP.

It is illegal for any member of the public to stop another New Zealander from using a public road, but police can.

Coster said police had worked alongside the community checkpoint­s to ensure they were lawful.

Police had used their power with discretion at the beginning of the lockdown because the checkpoint­s were a reaction to fears from vulnerable communitie­s which have historical­ly been badly impacted by disease, he said.

Having a small police presence at the checkpoint­s also acknowledg­ed the particular vulnerabil­ities the communitie­s had felt, Coster said.

If police had failed to understand the strength of that feeling and tried to shut the checkpoint­s down, there could have been protests which would have required a larger police presence.

Coster said he felt they made the right call.

But Bridges said police had effectivel­y condoned illegal checkpoint­s by working with the communitie­s.

“It’s one thing to turn a blind eye . . . but it’s entirely another thing to do what your officers have done, which is to come along and condone this unlawful activity by standing alongside those who have taken the law into their own hands.”

Coster rejected both assertions and shot back: “At no time have we turned a blind eye. Throughout we have actively protected the interest of New Zealanders to move freely on the roads.

“We’re not coming alongside and condoning an unlawful activity. We are conducting a lawful activity which is to check that people are complying with the level 3 controls that are in place.” The vast majority of the public supported the checkpoint­s, Coster said.

But they would not be allowed to continue under alert level 2 — that was the line they’d drawn in the sand.

“We’re on a journey with these communitie­s to help them understand that the risk is now low enough that the checkpoint­s are not warranted.”

Ardern echoed this deadline. Moving down alert levels indicated New Zealand was in a safe position so those communitie­s would no longer need that level of protection, she said.

Edgeler said roadblocks could be operated legally — but it mattered who was in charge. “Is a police officer actually telling you to do something, or is it not a police officer?

“If they’re just standing around and someone else is doing something — is the person who is actually exercising power someone who can?”

As police were the ones holding the legal authority to ask drivers to pull over or question people, Edgeler said he hoped it would be officers using that authority, rather than those that had no legal authority to.

 ?? Photo / Peter de Graaf ?? Volunteers at an iwi-run Covid-19 checkpoint in Kaikohe last Friday. Communty checkpoint­s will not be tolerated when the country moves to alert level 2, police have confirmed.
Photo / Peter de Graaf Volunteers at an iwi-run Covid-19 checkpoint in Kaikohe last Friday. Communty checkpoint­s will not be tolerated when the country moves to alert level 2, police have confirmed.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand