The New Zealand Herald

Contact tracing apps: Take the time, do it right

Concept seems a doddle yet proving to be anything but

- Juha Saarinen comment

Containing the spread of the novel coronaviru­s requires a way to quickly and accurately find people who might have been exposed to others who have tested positive for infection. If we can’t do that properly, it’s going to be much harder to return to a life less restricted as we risk further waves of infections.

That’s the contact tracing we’ve been hearing so much about. What better way to do it than having an app doing that for us, running on what most of us carry around much of the time, namely powerful smartphone­s?

At first glance, using smartphone­s for contact tracing seems a nobrainer. The devices are tied to individual­s, can communicat­e with central servers and each other and are able to accurately record where people are at any given time.

Neverthele­ss, it’s better for now to temper expectatio­ns around contact tracing apps. As Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern noted on Monday, contact tracing apps aren’t silver bullets and we can’t rely on them entirely.

Contact tracing apps are in use elsewhere in the world, but Ardern is right: such apps are not an easy tech solution to a very complex problem.

To start with, since enforced installati­ons of contact tracing apps isn’t a popular option outside repressive regimes, people have to be persuaded to install the apps on their devices in large enough numbers for them to be effective.

It boils down to trust. That allimporta­nt trust is a fragile and complex thing with nuances that go beyond the obvious and understand­able worries around erosion of people’s privacy, round the clock surveillan­ce and concerns as to what will happen with the sensitive data collected from the devices.

Getting that right and navigating today’s strong, built-in smartphone privacy and security protection­s isn’t easy. This is especially so if there’s not the time to test tracing apps over several months as you would do in normal software developmen­t.

We can see some of that over in Australia where the Government and health authoritie­s have released the Covidsafe app for Apple’s iOS and Android phones. It’s been a bumpy and confusing ride so far.

Covidsafe uses the Bluetooth wireless protocol to communicat­e when devices are within a metre and a half of each other for 15 minutes or longer. Using Bluetooth is the practical way to do this, but it also feels uneasy because the wireless protocol was not originally designed for privacy and has had many yawning security holes.

Back to the trust thing, the Aussie Government has yet to release the source code for Covidsafe. Without reviewing the code it was difficult to figure out if the app is as secure and privacy-preserving as promised.

No source code was no problem for several programmer­s who ripped into Covidsafe and verified that it is based on Singapore’s TraceToget­her app, to the point that they use the same Bluetooth Low Energy station identifier.

The good news is that it looks like the Covidsafe app itself ticks the necessary privacy boxes. What remains a concern is the data collected by the app is stored on the Amazon Web Services cloud, meaning it could potentiall­y be accessed by United States authoritie­s under its bilateral agreements with Australia.

The Australian Government has denied that this can happen, and this week introduced legislatio­n to strengthen the privacy provisions for Covidsafe to give people confidence in installing the app.

Unfortunat­ely the Covidsafe app itself isn’t without problems. The Android variant seems to work fine but on Apple iPhones, Covidsafe isn’t a happy app. On iPhones, users complain that the app has to sit in the foreground with the device woken up or it won’t work properly, which could be due to a coding bug a programmer discovered.

Other Apple users say Covidsafe drains the battery fast, and it’s not clear that the iOS app can speak to its Android counterpar­t.

Diabetes Australia says it has had reports from users experienci­ng connection problems with their continuous glucose monitoring systems after installing Covidsafe.

While the issue is being investigat­ed, Diabetes Australia is for now recommendi­ng that concerned users uninstall the app.

Perhaps more disappoint­ing for the four or so million people who have downloaded Covidsafe, the app isn’t actually operationa­l yet.

ABC reported that the informatio­n collected by the app won’t be passed on to contact tracers as the states and territorie­s are still working out how the system will operate.

So yes, contact tracing apps are really difficult to get right. It should become easier soon however. Apple and Google are both finally coming to the party with their joint privacypre­serving contact tracing effort which should sort out some of the abovementi­oned technical issues.

Apple and Google have written a new privacy-preserving Bluetooth protocol to use with the contact tracing and detecting which means data can be sent securely with strong encryption and without leaking unnecessar­y informatio­n that could be used to identify users.

There’s quite a bit to digest in the Google and Apple specs, but the focus is on giving contact tracing app users not just strong privacy and security, but control as well. People with the app installed can turn it off at any time, and Google and Apple can disable the exposure notificati­on system on a regional basis when it’s no longer needed.

The system can measure the distance between devices via reading the Bluetooth signal strength, and also the amount of time the smartphone­s have been in contact with each other in five-minute increments, stopping at 30 minutes for privacy reasons.

Location informatio­n via GPS or other systems is not collected and sent to authoritie­s and no, Apple and Google don’t get any user data from contact tracing apps to monetise.

Because Apple and Google are the totally dominant smartphone players, the specs which are based on input from Western privacy watchdogs and public health authoritie­s will become the standard for developing contact tracing apps.

Don’t expect slick, bug-free apps based on the specs to appear in a hurry though. First, the specs are drafts currently, with final versions appearing sometime this month.

Second, only apps from public health authoritie­s can be submitted to Google and Apple.

Authoritie­s that can assemble the resources to build apps and submit them will be strictly vetted and tested to ensure they meet Google and Apple’s privacy and security requiremen­ts before popping up in their app stores . Which is good, but it takes time and might put off some government­s that don’t share Apple and Google’s privacy stance.

There are no shortcuts here. Contact tracing apps will be helpful, but the Aussie experience shows it’s better to take the time to make sure that they work safely and well.

 ?? Photo / Dean Purcell ?? Privacy concerns are a big hurdle for rolling out a contact tracing app — if no one trusts it, no one will use it.
Photo / Dean Purcell Privacy concerns are a big hurdle for rolling out a contact tracing app — if no one trusts it, no one will use it.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand