The New Zealand Herald

GameStop: The long and the short of it

Retailer’s share market saga is fun to watch but unlikely, in the long run, to destabilis­e the broader market

- Mark Lister comment Mark Lister is Head of Private Wealth Research at Craigs Investment Partners. This column is general in nature and should not be regarded as specific investment advice.

The US sharemarke­t has stumbled over the past week, with the strong run we've seen since the election finally losing a bit of steam.

The unlikely catalyst for the selling pressure has been the tug of war between some large hedge funds and a group of retail investors.

A small group of US stocks, most notably GameStop, have been at the centre of this frenzy, and we have seen some extreme volatility in the share prices of these companies.

The intense moves have unnerved the broader investment community and with markets having risen so strongly in recent months, they found themselves sensitive to any bad news.

GameStop is a retailer of video games, and the pandemic and associated lockdowns haven't done any favours to its business. The structural move to online shopping had also been taking its toll.

This dire outlook has made the company a favourite of US hedge funds with a penchant for short selling.

Short selling is when an investor borrows stock from another owner, sells it, then buys it back cheaper and returns it to the lender.

When the short seller gets it right and the stock falls, they can do very well. It also gives these funds an opportunit­y to make money when markets are falling, as well as going up. That's one of the reasons they are referred to as hedge funds.

However, it's a risky business if things don't go according to plan.

If an investor shorts a stock which then rises, they will lose money because they must buy it back at a higher price. Some will choose to “cover their shorts” by doing this when they see the price going up, in the hope of cutting their losses.

If they hold their nerve and stay the course but the share price keeps rising even further, there is theoretica­lly no limit to how much they can lose.

That's a stark contrast from going “long” on a stock, which simply means owning it in the traditiona­l manner, in the hope that it performs well and rises over time.

In these instances, even if the company in question goes bankrupt and fails completely, you can't lose any more than what you put in.

With that in mind, consider how some of those hedge funds who have shorted GameStop are faring at the moment, given the share price has rocketed more than 1500 per cent in the past 12 trading sessions.

These huge moves have been driven by smaller retail investors, many of whom have mobilised using internet chat rooms about share trading. As the situation has attracted media attention, more small investors have jumped on the bandwagon and a speculativ­e frenzy has developed.

It's impossible to say how and when this situation ends, but it's almost certain that there will be some big losers.

Shorting isn't a common practice in this part of the world. This approach doesn't lend itself to a small, illiquid market like New Zealand. There are a few institutio­nal funds that pitch themselves as “long and short” managers, but I can count them all on one hand.

On its own, this sideshow isn't something that will destabilis­e the broader market. While it's interestin­g to watch, markets are much more focused on the big issues.

Having said that, we shouldn't ignore the impacts that broader participat­ion in capital markets will have. Lower fees for trading, widely available informatio­n, easy to use digital platforms and limited other investment options are likely to mean the involvemen­t of more younger people and more DIY investors.

That's a great thing, however it also brings with it some new risks and fresh challenges for regulators.

The GameStop party might not last forever and it could be quite a narrow door if the horde wants out all at once.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand