Rugby boss optimistic
Robinson responds to concerns from top players over $465m overseas investment
New Zealand Rugby boss Mark Robinson remains optimistic the proposed $465 million deal with United States technology investment giant Silver Lake will gain support, despite mediation with the Players’ Association starting today.
Robinson fronted media in Wellington yesterday after NZ Rugby’s March board meeting. Topics such as the provincial competition retaining the same format for this season, and the likely addition of Moana Pasifika and Fiji Drua to Super Rugby Aotearoa from 2022 were discussed. But the offer from Silver Lake to purchase 15 per cent of NZ Rugby’s commercial rights dominated.
Silver Lake’s offer will be voted on by the 26 provincial unions at NZ Rugby’s annual general meeting next month.
While the deal is expected to largely gain their support, the Players’ Association has opposed it.
As part of collective bargaining, NZ Rugby requires approval from the Players’ Association, who in late January sent a letter detailing concerns signed by David Kirk, the All Blacks’ 1987 World Cup-winning captain and NZRPA chairman, and chief executive Rob Nichol on behalf of the players’ board which includes All Blacks and Black Ferns Sam Cane, Sam Whitelock, Aaron Smith, Dane Coles, Sarah Hirini and Selica Winiata.
In outlining NZ Rugby’s view that the Silver Lake deal will greatly benefit all levels of the game by providing an immediate cash injection and establishing a future legacy fund, Robinson stressed evolution was needed.
“This is an opportunity we believe has real merit and we want to provide as much information, comfort, security and knowledge that we’ve done everything possible when we walk into any forum to give people confidence we’ve done that.
“As great as our legacy has been, there’s going to be a need to change the way we operate, and this provides us with the pathway to leverage those commercial opportunities to invest back into the game,” he said.
In terms of opposition from the Players’ Association, Robinson welcomed the chance to meet with Nichol and other representatives during a mediation process to tackle their concerns.
“That letter was dated at the end of January,” Robinson said. “There’s been a whole range of developments in that time since. We’re sharing more information all the time.
“We appreciate Rob’s views and he has been very public about those. We’re looking forward to the opportunity of sitting behind closed doors in the coming days and talking through those concerns.
“Part of our role here is to keep supplying Rob with information and help him understand the state of the game in this country and the potential benefits a partner might bring.
“This is a process where we want everyone in New Zealand rugby to be as comfortable as possible with what this means. It is a fundamental change, but it is something that can be hugely positive for the game,” said Robinson.
“We understand there’s a lot of emotion associated with it and that’s a good reflection of the care people have for the game in our country.”
Outside the Players’ Association, Robinson felt there was broad support from the provincial unions to Super Rugby franchises for the proposal.
“It’s only natural in a really important decision-making process that you have different points of view and we will keep working towards it,” he said.
One concern raised by the Players’ Association was the potential sale of Ma¯ori and Pasifika culture woven within NZ Rugby, which Robinson quickly dismissed.
“There’s been various speculation around the impact this could have on engagement and the way rugby interacts with the New Zealand public, especially Ma¯ori and Pasifika communities.
“It can play a fundamental role in allowing people to engage in a totally different way right across the country at all levels, and there would be people from our Ma¯ori rugby board willing to talk about the cultural ramifications and fit in this area.
“We don’t believe it’s our place or other peoples’ place to be talking about that. The people most relevant here are the Ma¯ori and Pasifika communities.”