The New Zealand Herald

Mike Hosking

- Continued from A48

Overall we are better served by choice, but it does require an element of work on behalf of the consumer as to where they choose.

increased audience by 25,364 listeners. They are major increases, especially when those numbers are heaped on to the total audience, which, as I pointed out at the start of this, sits at their highest level in the history of Newstalk ZB.

In other words, they’re recordbrea­king audiences.

As regards revenue, without giving anything commercial­ly sensitive away, it is safe to say ZB is far and away NZME’s biggest radio revenue earner, and the Mike Hosking Breakfast is the biggest revenue earner on ZB.

How do you get all that wrong when the numbers for NZME’s radio revenue earnings are publicly available, and any number of people at NZME would’ve been more than happy to correct the assertion or confirm the figures by answering an email or a phone call.

But sadly, it is why the media in part is in a parlous state with so many punters.

Making it worse is that Stuff trumpets the claim on its website that: “It is our mission to provide trustworth­y reporting for all New Zealanders.”

Dare I say, it’s not worth making the claim, unless you actually do it.

Now if I might offer an observatio­n from almost 40 years in this industry, it’s that some journalism is not what it was, nor indeed anywhere close, when it comes to profession­alism, fact-checking or balance.

As a result of that, trust has fallen by the wayside.

It’s made complicate­d by the partisan members of the game, and I include myself in that, so you have ended up with a lot of choice as to where to get your news and informatio­n from.

Choice is a good thing and overall we are better served by choice, but it does require an element of work on behalf of the consumer as to where they choose, and what weight they put on the provider.

Those who profess to be diligent, upfront, honest and fact-based need to do a better job, because the survey at AUT tells us standards have slipped.

The Stuff example of the ZB ratings in the grand scheme of things is hardly the end of the world, but it is part of the problem. If an article that wrong can be published with no fact checking and no sign-off of the facts checked, what else is put out that’s equally as wrong?

And unless the person on the receiving end of the inaccuraci­es — in this case me and my beloved radio station — says something, how many were left with the impression that what Stuff put out there was true, as opposed to what the truth really is?

The longer I am in this game, the more interested I’ve become in hoping and perhaps helping it provide a more valuable and polished service.

We all make mistakes, of course, but we can all work harder, do better, want more — and as a first step get the facts right.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand